Role of selective intra-operative cholangiography during cholecystectomy

被引:13
作者
Singh, G [1 ]
Gupta, PC [1 ]
Sridar, G [1 ]
Katariya, RN [1 ]
机构
[1] Postgrad Inst Med Educ & Res, Dept Surg, Chandigarh 160012, India
来源
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2000年 / 70卷 / 02期
关键词
cholecystectomy; choledocholithiasis; intra-operative cholangiography;
D O I
10.1046/j.1440-1622.2000.01765.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of routine intra-operative cholangiography (TOC) remains controversial. This prospective study was carried out to determine whether to perform selective or routine IOC in patients undergoing cholecystectomy for gallstones. Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing open cholecystectomy over a 16-month period were included in the present study. They were divided into two groups based on the absence (n = 79) or presence (n = 55) of indicators of choledocholithiasis. All patients were subjected to cholangiography. Each indicator, subsets of indicators and all indicators combined were evaluated for their ability to predict choledocholithiasis. Results: There would be only two missed stones (1.5%) if selective cholangiography was to be practised. Intra-operative cholangiography had a positive predictive value of 100%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy of all the indicators combined were 93.5%, 84.6%, 74.5%, 97.5% and 88.0%, respectively. The best indicators in each subset were jaundice, common bile duct diameter as assessed by ultrasonography, and a palpable stone during surgery with NPV of 82.7%, 91.1% and 96.8%, respectively. Conclusion: Routine IOC during cholecystectomy is not essential for the prevention of retained stones. A combination of the various indicators of choledocholithiasis can be used to select patients for cholangiography.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 109
页数:4
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] USEFULNESS OF STOOL SCREENING FOR DIAGNOSING CHOLELITHIASIS IN ACUTE-PANCREATITIS - DESCRIPTION OF TECHNIQUE
    ACOSTA, JM
    ROSSI, R
    LEDESMA, CL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 1977, 22 (02): : 168 - 172
  • [2] BENJAMIN WP, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P171
  • [3] Berci G., 1981, OPERATIVE BILIARY RA, DOI [10.1002/bjs.1800681123, DOI 10.1002/BJS.1800681123]
  • [4] COLE WH, 1974, AM SURGEON, V179, P528
  • [5] GALLBLADDER STONE FRAGMENTS IN FECES AFTER BILIARY EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY
    GREINER, L
    MUNKS, C
    HEIL, W
    JAKOBEIT, C
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1990, 98 (06) : 1620 - 1624
  • [6] HAUERJENSEN M, 1993, SURGERY, V113, P318
  • [7] PREDICTING COMMON BILE-DUCT LITHIASIS - DETERMINATION AND PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF A MODEL PREDICTING LOW-RISK
    HOUDART, R
    PERNICENI, T
    DARNE, B
    SALMERON, M
    SIMON, JF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 170 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [8] AVOIDANCE OF BILE-DUCT INJURY DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    HUNTER, JG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1991, 162 (01) : 71 - 76
  • [9] A prospective audit of selective cholangiography for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Jorgensen, JO
    Norman, SL
    Hunt, DR
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 66 (07): : 441 - 444
  • [10] KAKOS GS, 1972, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V104, P484