The ethics of neonatal research: A trialists' perspective

被引:4
|
作者
DeMauro, Sara B.
Foglia, Elizabeth E.
Schmidt, Barbara
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Perelman Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Ethics; Research; Infant; Newborn; Randomized controlled trial; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; NEWBORN-INFANTS; CAFFEINE THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; NITRIC-OXIDE; RESUSCITATION; DELIVERY; BORN; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.siny.2015.08.004
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
We are neonatal physicians who strive to practice evidence-based medicine. We conduct and promote randomized trials in preterm and critically ill infants to improve their care and outcomes. Controlled clinical trials are ethical and essential because randomization is the best strategy to minimize bias when evaluating therapies of uncertain benefit. Perinatal and neonatal randomized trials have identified better care practices, uncovered useless or harmful therapies, and revealed new knowledge gaps. We are convinced that neonatal randomized trials can be done safely and in partnership with the infants' families. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 435
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ethics in Psychology and Law: An International Perspective
    Allan, Alfred
    ETHICS & BEHAVIOR, 2015, 25 (06) : 443 - 457
  • [42] Management perspective of ethics in artificial intelligence
    Josef Baker-Brunnbauer
    AI and Ethics, 2021, 1 (2): : 173 - 181
  • [43] The Ethics of Suicide Research The Views of Ethics Committee Members
    Lakeman, Richard
    FitzGerald, Mary
    CRISIS-THE JOURNAL OF CRISIS INTERVENTION AND SUICIDE PREVENTION, 2009, 30 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [44] Research ethics committee decision-making in relation to an efficient neonatal trial
    Gale, C.
    Hyde, M. J.
    Modi, N.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2017, 102 (04): : F291 - F298
  • [45] Comparison of COVID-19 studies registered in the clinical trial platforms: A research ethics analysis perspective
    Buruk, Banu
    Guner, Muberra Devrim
    Ekmekci, Perihan Elif
    Celebi, Aksuyek Savas
    DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2022, 22 (04) : 217 - 230
  • [46] Consent and ethics within sex work and research: An academic and practitioner perspective
    Thompson, Beverly Y.
    Couple, Miss
    SEXUALITIES, 2021, 24 (5-6) : 803 - 809
  • [47] The Methodology in Empirical Sales Ethics Research: 1980-2010
    McClaren, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 127 (01) : 121 - 147
  • [48] An aphasia research agenda - a consensus statement from the collaboration of aphasia trialists
    Ali, Myzoon
    Soroli, Efstathia
    Jesus, Luis M. T.
    Cruice, Madeline
    Isaksen, Jytte
    Visch-Brink, Evy
    Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
    Jagoe, C.
    Kukkonen, Tarja
    Varlokosta, Spyridoula
    Hernandez-Sacristan, Carlos
    Rosell-Clari, Vicente
    Palmer, Rebecca
    Martinez-Ferreiro, Silvia
    Godecke, Erin
    Wallace, Sarah J.
    McMenamin, Ruth
    Copland, David
    Breitenstein, Caterina
    Bowen, Audrey
    Laska, Ann-Charlotte
    Hilari, Katerina
    Brady, Marian C.
    APHASIOLOGY, 2022, 36 (04) : 555 - 574
  • [49] The ethics of action research participation
    Davison, Robert M.
    Martinsons, Maris G.
    Wong, Louie H. M.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2022, 32 (03) : 573 - 594
  • [50] Ethics in cybersecurity research and practice
    Macnish, Kevin
    van der Ham, Jeroen
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2020, 63 (63)