Perceived Parental Support in Teen Dating Violence

被引:2
|
作者
Fitzpatrick, Jessica M. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Buffalo, Social Work Dept, 1300 Elmwood Ave,Caudell Hall 359, Buffalo, NY 14222 USA
关键词
parental support; teen dating violence; ABUSIVE PARTNER RELATIONSHIPS; HELPING RURAL WOMEN; ADOLESCENT; SURVIVORS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/sw/swac008
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
This qualitative study explores heterosexual teen girls' perceptions of parental support in abusive dating relationships during high school. Teen girls are at high risk for dating violence. Symbolic interaction theory asserts that meaning is assigned through our interactions, and these assigned meanings then influence our behavior. Findings demonstrate that teen girls assign meaning to dating and abuse, which is often reflective of traditional gender stereotypes, through their interactions with their boyfriends. However, due to the life course, parents of teens are in a unique position to provide different meanings that foster healthier dating relationships. Analysis of semistructured retrospective interviews found that, like adults, teen victims perceived parents' support to be inconsistent. Parents who provided support, such as ensuring safety, giving advice, and involving other professionals, played an instrumental role in helping teen girls end abusive dating relationships. Social workers should engage parents, schools, and peers in prevention education efforts that challenge gender norms and provide training on how to effectively intervene and provide support to teens that are experiencing abuse in their dating relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 174
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In Search of Teen Dating Violence Typologies
    Reidy, Dennis E.
    Ball, Barbara
    Houry, Debra
    Holland, Kristin M.
    Valle, Linda A.
    Kearns, Megan C.
    Marshall, Khiya J.
    Rosenbluth, Barri
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2016, 58 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [2] Witnessing Interparental Violence and Acceptance of Dating Violence as Predictors for Teen Dating Violence Victimization
    Karlsson, Marie E.
    Temple, Jeff R.
    Weston, Rebecca
    Le, Vi Donna
    VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2016, 22 (05) : 625 - 646
  • [3] Teen perceptions of adolescent dating violence
    Morrison, Katheryn E.
    Hymel, Shelley
    Craig, Wendy
    Dirks, Melanie
    Holfeld, Brett
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENCE, 2023, 95 (07) : 1348 - 1364
  • [4] A Primer for Preventing Teen Dating Violence? The Representation of Teen Dating Violence in Young Adult Literature and Its Implications for Prevention
    Storer, Heather L.
    Strohl, Katyayani R.
    VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN, 2017, 23 (14) : 1730 - 1751
  • [5] Male Perpetration of Teen Dating Violence: Associations with Neighborhood Violence Involvement, Gender Attitudes, and Perceived Peer and Neighborhood Norms
    Reed, Elizabeth
    Silverman, Jay G.
    Raj, Anita
    Decker, Michele R.
    Miller, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF URBAN HEALTH-BULLETIN OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, 2011, 88 (02): : 226 - 239
  • [6] Automatic Cognitions and Teen Dating Violence
    Jouriles, Ernest N.
    Grych, John H.
    Rosenfield, David
    McDonald, Renee
    Dodson, M. Catherine
    PSYCHOLOGY OF VIOLENCE, 2011, 1 (04) : 302 - 314
  • [7] Teen Dating Violence, Sexism, and Resilience: A Multivariate Analysis
    Dosil, Maria
    Jaureguizar, Joana
    Bernaras, Elena
    Sbicigo, Juliana Burges
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [8] Prioritizing Prevention of Teen Dating Violence
    Ragavan, Maya
    Miller, Elizabeth
    JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2022, 176 (02) : 127 - 128
  • [9] Teen dating violence. Implications of sexism and religion
    Sola, David Rodriguez
    Ayala, Encarnacion Soriano
    INTERDISCIPLINARIA, 2022, 39 (01): : 41 - 56
  • [10] Does change in perceptions of peer teen dating violence predict change in teen dating violence perpetration over time?
    Shorey, Ryan C.
    Wymbs, Brian
    Torres, Liz
    Cohen, Joseph R.
    Fite, Paula J.
    Temple, Jeff R.
    AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, 2018, 44 (02) : 156 - 164