A simulation-based approach to training in heuristic clinical decision-making

被引:11
作者
Altabbaa, Ghazwan [1 ]
Raven, Amanda D. [2 ]
Laberge, Jason [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calgary, Rockyview Gen Hosp, Cumming Sch Med, Dept Med, 7007 14th St SW, Calgary, AB T2V 1P9, Canada
[2] Alberta Hlth Serv, Dept Human Factors, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
clinical decision-making; cognitive bias; heuristics; misdiagnosis; simulation; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; ADVERSE EVENTS; PATIENT-SAFETY; CARE; QUALITY; STRATEGIES; ACCURACY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1515/dx-2018-0084
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cognitive biases may negatively impact clinical decision-making. The dynamic nature of a simulation environment can facilitate heuristic decision-making which can serve as a teaching opportunity. Methods: Momentum bias, confirmation bias, playing-the-odds bias, and order-effect bias were integrated into four simulation scenarios. Clinical simulation educators and human factors specialists designed a script of events during scenarios to trigger heuristic decision-making. Debriefing included the exploration of frames (mental models) resulting in the observed actions, as well as a discussion of specific bias-prone frames and bias-resistant frames. Simulation sessions and debriefings were coded to measure the occurrence of bias, recovery from biased decision-making, and effectiveness of debriefings. Results: Twenty medical residents and 18 medical students participated in the study. Twenty pairs (of one medical student and one resident) and two individuals (medical residents alone) completed a simulation session. Evidence of bias was observed in 11 of 20 (55%) sessions. While most participant pairs were able to avoid or recover from the anticipated bias, there were three sessions with no recovery. Evaluation of debriefings showed exploration of frames in all the participant pairs. Establishing new bias-resistant frames occurred more often when the learners experienced the bias. Conclusions: Instructional design using experiential learning can focus learner attention on the specific elements of diagnostic decision-making. Using scenario design and debriefing enabled trainees to experience and analyze their own cognitive biases.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 99
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ARECCI ETH SCREEN TO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, K LEW GROUPS EXP LEA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, ASHE ERIC HIGHER ED
[4]   Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine [J].
Berner, Eta S. ;
Graber, Mark L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 121 (05) :2-23
[5]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[6]  
Cosby KS, 2003, ACAD EMERG MED, V10, P69, DOI 10.1197/aemj.10.1.69
[7]   The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them [J].
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (08) :775-780
[8]   Achieving quality in clinical decision making: Cognitive strategies and detection of bias [J].
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 9 (11) :1184-1204
[9]   Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning [J].
Croskerry, Pat .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 14 :27-35
[10]   Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective [J].
Elstein, Arthur S. .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2009, 14 :7-18