Clarifying the Interstitial Nature of Facets From the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Using the Five Factor Model of Personality

被引:20
作者
Watters, Carolyn A. [1 ,4 ]
Sellbom, Martin [2 ]
Uliaszek, Amanda A. [1 ]
Bagby, R. Michael [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Otago, Dept Psychol, POB 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychiat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Trent Univ, Dept Psychol, Peterborough, ON, Canada
关键词
five-factor model; factor structure; Personality Inventory for DSM-5; NEO Personality Inventory; personality disorders; 5-FACTOR MODEL; TRAIT MODEL; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; CAT-PD; DSM-5; INVENTORY; DISORDER; CONVERGENT; PID-5; DISCRIMINANT;
D O I
10.1037/per0000327
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although the higher order structure of the Personality Inventory for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (PID-5; Krueger, Derringer, Markon, Watson, & Skodol. 2012), is well-established, the lower order structure and facet-to-domain assignment is inconsistent across studies. Some studies used the five-factor model of adaptive personality (FFM) as a framework to evaluate and characterize this lower order structure; however, findings have been limited in various respects including the use of primarily Caucasian and nonclinical samples. The goal of the current investigation was to clarify and extend knowledge of the lower order structure of the PID-5 through joint PID-5/FFM analysis using an ethnically diverse undergraduate sample (N = 492) and psychiatric patient sample (N = 388). Our findings revealed an optimal five-factor structure in the undergraduate sample (in which Openness facets did not load on any factor) and a six-factor structure in the clinical sample (in which Openness formed its own factor). Domains displayed good convergent validity with the domains of the personality psychopathology five model, except for Disinhibition/Conscientiousness, in which the lack of convergence was explained by Conscientiousness. Furthermore, we evaluated six specific PID-5 facets with respect to interstitiality and optimal PID-5 domain placement, where results supported several recommendations for model modification of the PID-5 structure. These include moving Restricted Affectivity to Detachment from Negative Affectivity, moving Hostility to Antagonism from Negative Affectivity, moving Suspiciousness to Negative Affectivity from Detachment, and removing Submissiveness from the PID-5 measure and the alternative model of personality disorders.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 339
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Narcissism and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder [J].
Miller, Joshua D. ;
Crowe, Michael L. ;
Sharpe, Brinkley M. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 13 (04) :407-411
[42]   Characterizing Psychopathy Using DSM-5 Personality Traits [J].
Strickland, Casey M. ;
Drislane, Laura E. ;
Lucy, Megan ;
Krueger, Robert F. ;
Patrick, Christopher J. .
ASSESSMENT, 2013, 20 (03) :327-338
[43]   The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample [J].
Bastiaens, Tim ;
Claes, Laurence ;
Smits, Dirk ;
De Clercq, Barbara ;
De Fruyt, Filip ;
Rossi, Gina ;
Vanwalleghem, Dominique ;
Vermote, Rudi ;
Lowyck, Benedicte ;
Claes, Stephan ;
De Hert, Marc .
ASSESSMENT, 2016, 23 (01) :42-51
[44]   The Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) from the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model [J].
Widiger, Thomas A. ;
McCabe, Gillian A. .
PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 2020, 53 (3-4) :149-156
[45]   Predicting Dropout Using DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorders, and DSM-5 Section III Personality Traits, in a (Day)Clinical Sample of Personality Disorders [J].
Berghuis, Han ;
Bandell, Coen C. ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 12 (04) :331-338
[46]   Personality Constructs and Paradigms in the Alternative DSM-5 Model of Personality Disorder [J].
Mulay, Abby L. ;
Cain, Nicole M. ;
Waugh, Mark H. ;
Hopwood, Christopher J. ;
Adler, Jonathan M. ;
Garcia, Darren J. ;
Kurtz, John E. ;
Lenger, Katherine A. ;
Skadberg, Rebecca .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 100 (06) :593-602
[47]   Comparing the Dependability and Associations With Functioning of the DSM-5 Section III Trait Model of Personality Pathology and the DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorder Model [J].
Chmielewski, Michael ;
Ruggero, Camilo J. ;
Kotov, Roman ;
Liu, Keke ;
Krueger, Robert F. .
PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 8 (03) :228-236
[48]   Implications for the Measurement of Psychopathy in the DSM-5 Using the Computerized Adaptive Test of Personality Disorder [J].
Kavish, Nicholas ;
Sellbom, Martin ;
Anderson, Jaime L. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 101 (05) :468-480
[49]   Personality Disorders in DSM-5: Emerging Research on the Alternative Model [J].
Morey, Leslie C. ;
Benson, Kathryn T. ;
Busch, Alexander J. ;
Skodol, Andrew E. .
CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (04)
[50]   Examining procrastination using the DSM-5 personality trait model: Disinhibition as a core personality trait [J].
Cruz, Reymond Neal C. ;
Miranda, Jonee O. O. .
CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 43 (07) :6243-6252