Carbon footprint of sugar production in Mexico

被引:38
|
作者
Garcia, Carlos A. [1 ]
Garcia-Trevino, Edgar S. [2 ]
Aguilar-Rivera, Noe [3 ]
Armendariz, Cynthia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Escuela Nacl Estudios Super, Unidad Morelia, Jiquilpan De Juarez 58190, Michoacan, Mexico
[2] Univ Americas Puebla, Cholula, Mexico
[3] Univ Veracruzana, Fac Ciencias Biol & Agr, Cordoba 94945, Veracruz, Mexico
关键词
Global warming; Greenhouse gas emissions; Sugarcane cultivation; Sugar mill; Cogeneration; Uncertainty analysis; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS BALANCE; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; GHG EMISSIONS; ENERGY; GENERATION; CONVERSION; MOLASSES; HARVEST; BIOFUEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.113
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Global warming, caused mainly by increased worldwide emissions of greenhouse gases, is currently one of the greatest threats to the environment and human societies. Mexico has set an ambitious goal of reducing 30% of its greenhouse gases emissions by year 2020. The sugar agroindustry has been identified as one of the opportunities for mitigating emissions in this country. The aim of this work is to contribute towards identifying policy measures and practices for low-carbon sugar production by assessing the carbon footprint of sugar produced in four sugar mills in Mexico using a life cycle,assessment method. System boundaries include agricultural practices, sugarcane harvesting, cane milling and sugar conversion. The results show that sugar production has carbon footprint values in the range of 0.45-0.63 kg CO(2)e/kg sugar. In these four cases, the agricultural stage contributes the majority of carbon emissions (59-74%). Most greenhouse gases emissions in the agricultural stage were from fertilizer production, nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions and biomass burning. The industrial stage contributed with 14-30% of total greenhouse gases emissions, mainly due to fossil fuel and bagasse use. The carbon footprint value is particularly sensitive to nitrogen fertilization, nitrous oxide emissions from the soil and sugarcane yields. Cogeneration in sugar mills could become an important way to reduce the carbon footprint of sugar and to produce electricity with low carbon emissions. We show the impact of different carbon footprint performance of sugar production process in Mexico. Data used on this manuscript came from real field measurements, and our results are accompanied by sensibility and uncertainty analyses. This is the first time that life cycle assessment has been used to estimate the carbon footprint of sugar production in Mexico including agricultural, industrial and transportation boundaries, to identify greenhouse gases mitigation opportunities. Studying techniques for improving sugar cane yield, making fertilizer use more efficient, minimizing cane burning and developing efficient cogeneration in sugar mills with bagasse as fuel is scientifically relevant. Applying concrete public policy measures to these areas of opportunity would allow production of low carbon sugar in Mexico. The results of this study may also be used as reference by other countries with similar sugar production conditions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2632 / 2641
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A deterministic carbon footprint modelling across the supply chain of electricity
    Dalir, Fatemeh
    Motlagh, Majid Shafiepour
    Ashrafi, Khosro
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2018, 15 (02) : 143 - 156
  • [32] Integrated assessment of the net carbon footprint of small hydropower plants
    Gomez-Gener, Lluis
    Gubau, Marina
    von Schiller, Daniel
    Marce, Rafael
    Obrador, Biel
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 18 (08)
  • [33] Supply Chain Network Carbon Footprint of Forest Biomass to Biorefinery
    Tolon, Fahriye Enda
    Karaosmanoglu, Filiz
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY, 2021, 40 (02) : 124 - 141
  • [34] Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems
    Stackhouse-Lawson, K. R.
    Rotz, C. A.
    Oltjen, J. W.
    Mitloehner, F. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2012, 90 (12) : 4641 - 4655
  • [35] Carbon footprint and water footprint of rice and wheat production in Punjab, India
    Kashyap, Durba
    Agarwal, Tripti
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2021, 186
  • [36] Environmental footprint of aluminum production in China
    Zhang, Yanlu
    Sun, Mingxing
    Hong, Jinglan
    Han, Xiaofei
    He, Jing
    Shi, Wenxiao
    Li, Xiangzhi
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 133 : 1242 - 1251
  • [37] Assessing the urban carbon footprint: An overview
    Lombardi, Mariarosaria
    Laiola, Elisabetta
    Tricase, Caterina
    Rana, Roberto
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2017, 66 : 43 - 52
  • [38] Carbon footprint of crop production in Heilongjiang land reclamation area, China
    Chu, Tianshu
    Yu, Lu
    Wang, Derui
    Yang, Zengling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 15 (01) : 182 - 191
  • [39] Carbon Footprint Estimation for Oil Production: Iraq Case Study for The Utilization of Waste Gas in Generating Electricity
    Al-Fehdly, H.
    ElMaraghy, W.
    Wilkinson, S.
    26TH CIRP CONFERENCE ON LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING (LCE), 2019, 80 : 389 - 392
  • [40] Can carbon footprint serve as an indicator of the environmental impact of meat production?
    Roos, Elin
    Sundberg, Cecilia
    Tidaker, Pernilla
    Strid, Ingrid
    Hansson, Per-Anders
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2013, 24 : 573 - 581