Minimal detectable difference of the finger and wrist range of motion: comparison of goniometry and 3D motion analysis

被引:65
作者
Reissner, Lisa [1 ]
Fischer, Gabriella [2 ]
List, Renate [2 ,3 ]
Taylor, William R. [2 ]
Giovanoli, Pietro [1 ]
Calcagni, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Univ Zurich Hosp, Div Plast Surg & Hand Surg, Raemistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Fed Inst Technol, Inst Biomech, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Schulthess Clin, Human Performance Lab, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Manual goniometer; 3D motion capture; Range of motion; Motion analysis; Minimal detectable difference; ORIENTATION IN-SPACE; ANALYSIS SYSTEM; RELIABILITY; MOVEMENT; KINEMATICS; VALIDITY; FLEXION; ELBOW; DEFINITION; INTERRATER;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-019-1177-y
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundThe measurement of finger and wrist range of motion (ROM) is of great importance to clinicians when assessing functional outcomes of therapeutic interventions and surgical procedures. The purpose of the study was to assess the repeatability of ROM measurements of the hand joints with manual goniometer and 3D motion capture system and to calculate the minimal detectable difference for both methods.MethodsActive finger and wrist joints ROM of 20 healthy volunteers were assessed using a manual goniometer and 3D motion capture system. Minimal detectable difference (MDD) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated for both measurement systems and compared within the same task. Maximal ROM of all joints was registered twice on two different days to evaluate the test-retest repeatability. The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) was calculated and examined to determine if reliability 0.70 existed.ResultsMDD for the 3D motion capture was between 5 and 12 degrees except for the metacarpophalangeal joint (MCP) 1, interphalangeal joint (IP), and MCP5. SEM values lay between 2 and 4 degrees for all joints except for the MCP5, IP, and MCP1. For the goniometric measurements, MDD and SEM were between 12-30 degrees and 4-11 degrees, respectively. The reliability criterion (ICC>0.7) was achieved for the ROM measurement with the 3D motion capture system for 94% of the joints and in only 65% of the joints with the manual goniometer.ConclusionsJoint ROM assessed with 3D motion analysis showed higher test-retest agreement demonstrating overall better repeatability for this method. Because of the smaller measurement error, the 3D motion capture system has a smaller MDD. Only individual test-rest differences bigger than the MDD can be considered as real changes, and therefore, in an experimental situation, the use of a more precise measurement method can greatly reduce the number of subjects needed for a statistical significance. Goniometer measurements of some joints should be carefully interpreted, due to a low repeatability and reliability.Trial registrationThis study is approved by the Ethical Committee Zurich (Kek-ZH-Nr: 2015-0395).
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm [J].
Armstrong, AD ;
MacDermid, JC ;
Chinchalkar, S ;
Stevens, RS ;
King, GJW .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1998, 7 (06) :573-580
[2]   RELIABILITY OF GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
BOONE, DC ;
AZEN, SP ;
LIN, CM ;
SPENCE, C ;
BARON, C ;
LEE, L .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1978, 58 (11) :1355-1360
[3]   POSITION AND ORIENTATION IN-SPACE OF BONES DURING MOVEMENT - ANATOMICAL FRAME DEFINITION AND DETERMINATION [J].
CAPPOZZO, A ;
CATANI, F ;
DELLA CROCE, U ;
LEARDINI, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (04) :171-178
[4]   Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: Experimental artefacts [J].
Cappozzo, A ;
Catani, F ;
Leardini, A ;
Benedetti, MG ;
DellaCroce, U .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 11 (02) :90-100
[5]  
Casanova J, 2013, ASHT CLIN ASSESSMENT
[6]   The motion analysis system and goniometry of the finger joints [J].
Chiu, HY ;
Su, FC ;
Wang, ST ;
Hsu, HY .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-BRITISH AND EUROPEAN VOLUME, 1998, 23B (06) :788-791
[7]  
Clarkson HM., MUSCULOSKELETAL ASSE
[8]   Measurements of wrist and finger postures: A comparison of goniometric and motion capture techniques [J].
Cook, James R. ;
Baker, Nancy A. ;
Cham, Rakie ;
Hale, Erin ;
Redfern, Mark S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOMECHANICS, 2007, 23 (01) :70-78
[9]   A novel method for in-vivo evaluation of finger kinematics including definition of healthy motion patterns [J].
Coupier, Jerome ;
Hamoudi, Samir ;
Telese-Izzi, Sonia ;
Feipel, Veronique ;
Rooze, Marcel ;
Jan, Serge Van Sint .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 31 :47-58
[10]   When to use agreement versus reliability measures [J].
de Vet, Henrica C. W. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 59 (10) :1033-1039