Measuring Four Perspectives of Justice Sensitivity With Two Items Each

被引:65
作者
Baumert, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Beierlein, Constanze [3 ]
Schmitt, Manfred [1 ]
Kemper, Christoph J. [3 ]
Kovaleva, Anastassiya [4 ]
Liebig, Stefan [5 ]
Rammstedt, Beatrice [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Koblenz Landau, Dept Psychol, D-76829 Landau, Germany
[2] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[3] GESIS Leibniz Inst Social Sci, Dept Survey Design & Methodol, Mannheim, Germany
[4] Univ Bielefeld, Dept Didact Biol, Bielefeld, Germany
[5] Univ Bielefeld, Dept Sociol, Bielefeld, Germany
关键词
ORGANIZATIONAL INJUSTICE; TESTING MEASUREMENT; FIT INDEXES; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; SELF-EFFICACY; PERSONALITY; CONTEXT; HEALTH; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2013.836526
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
People differ systematically in their vulnerability to injustice. We present two-item scales for the efficient measurement of justice sensitivity from 4 perspectives (victim, observer, beneficiary, perpetrator). In Study 1 using a quota-based sample of German adults, a latent state-trait analysis revealed the factorial validity and high reliabilities of the scales. In Study 2 employing a large random sample, we tested for measurement invariance of the items within the context of our short 2-item scales compared to the original 10-item scales. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses confirmed that the validity of the indicators and the internal structure of the assessed constructs did not change across item contexts. In both studies, correlations with personality dimensions and life satisfaction provide evidence for the validity of our scales. With the presented instrument, future research can extend scientific knowledge regarding the role of individual differences in reactions to injustice for the explanation of well-being and physical health.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 390
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[21]  
Hessler C., 2012, EFFECTS JUSTICE SENS
[22]   Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives [J].
Hu, Li-tze ;
Bentler, Peter M. .
STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) :1-55
[23]  
Jakoby N., 1999, ZUMA-Nachrichten, V45, P61
[24]   Does the rose still smell as sweet? Item variability across test forms and revisions [J].
Knowles, ES ;
Condon, CA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2000, 12 (03) :245-252
[25]   Measurement-induced improvement in anxiety: Mean shifts with repeated assessment [J].
Knowles, ES ;
Coker, MC ;
Scott, RA ;
Cook, DA ;
Neville, JW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (02) :352-363
[27]   Individual Differences in Third-Party Interventions: How Justice Sensitivity Shapes Altruistic Punishment [J].
Lotz, Sebastian ;
Baumert, Anna ;
Schloesser, Thomas ;
Gresser, Franz ;
Fetchenhauer, Detlef .
NEGOTIATION AND CONFLICT MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (04) :297-313
[28]  
Lovas L, 2002, STUD PSYCHOL, V44, P125
[29]   WHAT PEOPLE REGARD AS UNJUST - TYPES AND STRUCTURES OF EVERYDAY EXPERIENCES OF INJUSTICE [J].
MIKULA, G ;
PETRI, B ;
TANZER, N .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 20 (02) :133-149
[30]  
Milfont TL, 2010, INT J PSYCHOL RES, V3, P111