Green finance support for development of green buildings in China: Effect, mechanism, and policy implications

被引:25
作者
He, Wenhua [1 ]
Liu, Pei [2 ]
Lin, Borong [3 ,4 ]
Zhou, Hao [3 ,5 ]
Chen, Xuesheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ, Business Sch, Dept Finance, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Business Sch, Dept Management Sci, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Dept Bldg Sci, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Eco Planning & Green Bldg, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Tsinghua Univ, Think Tank Ctr, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
Green building; Green finance; Performance gap; Econometrics; Time series analysis; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CO2; EMISSIONS; PERFORMANCE; QUALITY; SYSTEM; GAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112973
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The building sector accounts for a major portion of China's total energy use and energy-related CO2 emissions. Promoting the development of green buildings (GBs) via the application of green financial instruments (GFIs, including green fiscal investment, green credit, green insurance, and green bonds) is crucial for China to achieve carbon mitigation goals. This study explores the effect and mechanism of GFIs on supporting the development of GBs using time series econometrics. Results show that the overall green finance system exhibits significant supporting effects on the development of GBs. Among four types of GFIs, green fiscal investment plays a critical and an indispensable role. The effects of alternative GFI combinations on GB development are compared. The combination of green fiscal investment, insurance, and credit shows the most satisfactory supporting effect. In this combination, insurance plays a bridging role, as it better ensures that GBs' actual energy performance meets expected performance, thus promoting green credit financing for GBs. However, the results also indicate that the current green finance market is still in a government-driven pattern. To facilitate its transformation to a market driven pattern, policies should focus on designing more targeted GFI-combination products, bridging GBs' performance gaps, and updating GBs' rating system.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]   Carbon risk and optimal retrofitting in cement plants: An application of stochastic modelling, MonteCarlo simulation and Real Options Analysis [J].
Abadie, Luis M. ;
Goicoechea, Nestor ;
Galarraga, Ibon .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :3117-3130
[2]  
Berrou R, 2019, PALG STUD IMPACT FIN, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-22510-0_1
[3]   Role of financial mechanisms for accelerating the rate of water and energy efficiency retrofits in Australian public buildings: Hybrid Bayesian Network and System Dynamics modelling approach [J].
Bertone, Edoardo ;
Sahin, Oz ;
Stewart, Rodney A. ;
Zou, Patrick X. W. ;
Alam, Morshed ;
Hampson, Keith ;
Blair, Evan .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 210 :409-419
[4]  
Building Energy Research Center of Tsinghua University, 2020, 2020 ANN REP CHIN BU
[5]  
Chen L, 2020, STUDY EXPLORATION, P117
[6]  
China Banking Association, 2017, CHIN BANK CORP SOC R
[7]  
China Banking Association, 2021, CHIN BANK ASS DAT
[8]  
China Central Depository and Clearing Corporation, 2021, CHIN
[9]  
China Society for Urban Studies, 2020, CHIN GREEN BUILD 202
[10]   An evolutionary analysis of green finance sustainability based on multi-agent game [J].
Cui, Herui ;
Wang, Ruoyao ;
Wang, Haoran .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269