High-Resolution Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for the Separation of Benign From Malignant BI-RADS 4/5 Lesions Found on Breast MRI at 3T

被引:58
作者
Wisner, Dorota J. [1 ]
Rogers, Nathan [1 ]
Deshpande, Vibhas S. [2 ]
Newitt, David N. [1 ]
Laub, Gerhard A. [3 ]
Porter, David A. [4 ]
Kornak, John [5 ]
Joe, Bonnie N. [1 ]
Hylton, Nola M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol & Biomed Imaging, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
[2] Siemens Healthcare, Magnet Resonance Res & Dev, Austin, TX USA
[3] Siemens Healthcare, Magnet Resonance Res & Dev, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Siemens Healthcare, Magnet Resonance Res & Dev, Erlangen, Germany
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94115 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast MRI; diffusion; DWI; screening; benign; malignant; CANCER; VALUES; CARCINOMA; CONTRAST;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.24416
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion imaging (RESOLVE) improves separation of malignant versus benign lesions compared to standard single-shot echo-planar imaging (ss-EPI) on BI-RADS 4/5 lesions detected on breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Materials and Methods: Consecutive 3T breast MRI studies with BI-RADS 4/5 designation and subsequent biopsy or benign mastectomy were retrospectively identified. Freehand regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on lesions and also on normal background fibroglandular tissue for comparison. Lesion-to-background contrast was evaluated by normalizing signal intensity of the lesion ROI by the normal background tissue ROI at b = 800. Statistical analysis used the Mann-Whitney/Wilcoxon rank-sum test for unpaired and Wilcoxon signed-rank for paired comparisons. Results: Of 38 lesions in 32 patients, 10 were malignant. Lesion-to-background contrast was higher on RESOLVE than ss-EPI (1.80 +/- 0.71 vs. 1.62 +/- 0.63, P = 0.03). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was the same or lower on RESOLVE than ss-EPI, and this effect was largest in malignant lesions (RESOLVE 0.90 +/- 0.13; ss-EPI 1.00 +/- 0.13; median difference -0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.17, -0.02) x 10(-3) mm(2)/sec; P = 0.014). By either diffusion method, there was a statistically significant difference between benign and malignant mean ADC (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Increased lesion-to-background contrast and improved separation of benign from malignant lesions by RESOLVE compared to standard diffusion suggests that RESOLVE may show promise as an adjunct to clinical breast MRI.
引用
收藏
页码:674 / 681
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Assessment of Breast Lesions With Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Comparing the Use of Different b Values
    Arantes Pereira, Fernanda Philadelpho
    Martins, Gabriela
    Figueiredo, Eduardo
    Aidar Domingues, Marisa Nassar
    Domingues, Romeu Cortes
    Barbosa da Fonseca, Lea Mirian
    Gasparetto, Emerson Leandro
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (04) : 1030 - 1035
  • [2] Readout-segmented Echo-pIanar Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted MR Breast Examinations at 3.0 T
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Pinker-Domenig, Katja
    Bickel, Hubert
    Chmelik, Marek
    Weber, Michael
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    Gruber, Stephan
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2012, 263 (01) : 64 - 76
  • [3] Diffusion-weighted MR for Differentiation of Breast Lesions at 3.0 T: How Does Selection of Diffusion Protocols Affect Diagnosis?
    Bogner, Wolfgang
    Gruber, Stephan
    Pinker, Katja
    Grabner, Guenther
    Stadlbauer, Andreas
    Weber, Michael
    Moser, Ewald
    Helbich, Thomas H.
    Trattnig, Siegfried
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) : 341 - 351
  • [4] Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: A review of evidence-based clinical applications
    DeMartini, Wendy
    Lehman, Constance
    Partridge, Savannah
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (04) : 408 - 416
  • [5] Diffusion-weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional 3.0-T Breast MR Imaging
    El Khouli, Riham H.
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Mezban, Sarah D.
    Huang, Peng
    Kamel, Ihab R.
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Bluemke, David A.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2010, 256 (01) : 64 - 73
  • [6] The effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted imaging
    Firat, AK
    Sanli, B
    Karakas, HM
    Erdem, G
    [J]. NEURORADIOLOGY, 2006, 48 (07) : 465 - 470
  • [7] Drop metastases to the pediatric spine revealed with diffusion-weighted MR imaging
    Hayes, Laura L.
    Jones, Richard A.
    Palasis, Susan
    Aguilera, Dolly
    Porter, David A.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2012, 42 (08) : 1009 - 1013
  • [8] Clinical Application of Readout-Segmented-Echo-Planar Imaging for Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Pediatric Brain
    Holdsworth, S. J.
    Yeom, K.
    Skare, S.
    Gentles, A. J.
    Barnes, P. D.
    Bammer, R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (07) : 1274 - 1279
  • [9] MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study
    Kuhl, Christiane K.
    Schrading, Simone
    Bieling, Heribert B.
    Wardelmann, Eva
    Leutner, Claudia C.
    Koenig, Roy
    Kuhn, Walther
    Schild, Hans H.
    [J]. LANCET, 2007, 370 (9586) : 485 - 492
  • [10] Contribution of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Characterization of Breast Tumors
    Kul, Sibel
    Cansu, Aysegul
    Alhan, Etem
    Dinc, Hasan
    Gunes, Gurbuz
    Reis, Abdulkadir
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (01) : 210 - 217