Addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of high-energy photon beams

被引:227
作者
McEwen, Malcolm [1 ]
DeWerd, Larry [2 ]
Ibbott, Geoffrey [3 ]
Followill, David [4 ]
Rogers, David W. O. [5 ]
Seltzer, Stephen [6 ]
Seuntjens, Jan [7 ]
机构
[1] CNR, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53705 USA
[3] Univ Texas Houston, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] IROC Houston QA Ctr, Radiol Phys Ctr, Houston, TX 77054 USA
[5] Carleton Univ, Dept Phys, Carleton Lab Radiotherapy Phys, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
[6] Natl Inst Stand & Technol, Gaithersburg, MD 20899 USA
[7] McGill Univ, Med Phys Unit, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
photon beams; dosimetry protocol; ionization chamber; beam quality conversion factors; kQ; uncertainty analysis; absorbed dose calibration coefficients; CYLINDRICAL IONIZATION CHAMBERS; QUALITY CORRECTION FACTORS; ION RECOMBINATION CORRECTIONS; MONTE-CARLO-SIMULATION; ABSORBED-DOSE RATIOS; AIR CAVITY SIZE; EFFECTIVE POINT; ELECTRON DOSIMETRY; AMBIENT-PRESSURE; PLANE-PARALLEL;
D O I
10.1118/1.4866223
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
An addendum to the AAPM's TG-51 protocol for the determination of absorbed dose to water in megavoltage photon beams is presented. This addendum continues the procedure laid out in TG-51 but new k(Q) data for photon beams, based on Monte Carlo simulations, are presented and recommendations are given to improve the accuracy and consistency of the protocol's implementation. The components of the uncertainty budget in determining absorbed dose to water at the reference point are introduced and the magnitude of each component discussed. Finally, the consistency of experimental determination of N-D,N-w coefficients is discussed. It is expected that the implementation of this addendum will be straightforward, assuming that the user is already familiar with TG-51. The changes introduced by this report are generally minor, although new recommendations could result in procedural changes for individual users. It is expected that the effort on the medical physicist's part to implement this addendum will not be significant and could be done as part of the annual linac calibration. (C) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 111 条
[81]   Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study [J].
Palmans, H ;
Nafaa, L ;
De Jans, J ;
Gillis, S ;
Hoornaert, MT ;
Martens, C ;
Piessens, M ;
Thierens, H ;
Van der Plaetsen, A ;
Vynckier, S .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2002, 47 (03) :421-440
[82]   Key comparison BIPM.RI(I)-K6 of the standards for absorbed dose to water of the PTB, Germany and the BIPM in accelerator photon beams [J].
Picard, S. ;
Burns, D. T. ;
Roger, P. ;
Allisy-Roberts, P. J. ;
Kapsch, R. P. ;
Krauss, A. .
METROLOGIA, 2011, 48
[83]  
*PTW, 2000, D16520002 PTW
[84]   PENLINAC:: extending the capabilities of the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE for the simulation of therapeutic beams [J].
Rodriguez, M. L. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 53 (17) :4573-4593
[85]   THE ROLE OF HUMIDITY AND OTHER CORRECTION FACTORS IN THE AAPM TG-21 DOSIMETRY PROTOCOL [J].
ROGERS, DWO ;
ROSS, CK .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (01) :40-48
[86]   Correcting for electron contamination at dose maximum in photon beams [J].
Rogers, DWO .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (04) :533-537
[87]  
Rogers W.O., 2009, Clinical Dosimetry Measurements in Radiotherapy, P239
[88]   Absorbed dose to water reference dosimetry using solid phantoms in the context of absorbed-dose protocols [J].
Seuntjens, J ;
Olivares, M ;
Evans, M ;
Podgorsak, E .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (09) :2945-2953
[89]  
Seuntjens J., 2002, STANDARDS CODES PRAC, P37
[90]   Photon absorbed dose standards [J].
Seuntjens, Jan ;
Duane, Simon .
METROLOGIA, 2009, 46 (02) :S39-S58