ESI outcompetes other ion sources in LC/MS trace analysis

被引:16
作者
Laaniste, Asko [1 ]
Leito, Ivo [1 ]
Kruve, Anneli [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tartu, Inst Chem, Ravila 14a, EE-50411 Tartu, Estonia
关键词
Ion source; Pesticide; Heated electrospray; APPI; Multimode; ATMOSPHERIC-PRESSURE PHOTOIONIZATION; IONIZATION-MASS-SPECTROMETRY; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY; LC-MS/MS METHODS; ELECTROSPRAY-IONIZATION; CHEMICAL-IONIZATION; SOURCE DESIGN; APCI; MATRIX; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s00216-019-01832-z
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Choosing an appropriate ion source is a crucial step in liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC/MS) method development. In this paper, we compare four ion sources for LC/MS analysis of 40 pesticides in tomato and garlic matrices. We compare electrospray ionisation (ESI) source, thermally focused/heated electrospray (HESI), atmospheric pressure photoionisation (APPI) source with and without dopant, and multimode source in ESI mode, atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation (APCI) mode, and combined mode using both ESI and APCI, i.e. altogether seven different ionisation modes. The lowest limits of detection (LoDs) were obtained by ESI and HESI. Widest linear ranges were observed with the conventional ESI source without heated nebuliser gas. In comparison to HESI, ESI source was significantly less affected by matrix effect. APPI ranked second (after ESI) by not being influenced by matrix effect; therefore, it would be a good alternative to ESI if low LoDs are not required.
引用
收藏
页码:3533 / 3542
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, API 4000 LC MS MS SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INT VOC METR GEN CON
[3]   On the signal response of various pesticides in electrospray and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization depending on the flow-rate of eluent applied in liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Asperger, A ;
Efer, R ;
Koal, T ;
Engewald, W .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2001, 937 (1-2) :65-72
[4]   Mass Spectrometry, Review of the Basics: Ionization [J].
Awad, Hanan ;
Khamis, Mona M. ;
El-Aneed, Anas .
APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 (02) :158-175
[5]   Comparison of atmospheric pressure photoionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization for normal-phase LC/MS chiral analysis of pharmaceuticals [J].
Cai, Sheng-Suan ;
Hanold, Karl A. ;
Syage, Jack A. .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 79 (06) :2491-2498
[6]   Comparison of atmospheric pressure photoionization, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry for analysis of lipids [J].
Cai, SS ;
Syage, JA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 78 (04) :1191-1199
[7]   Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric confirmatory method for determining aflatoxin M1 in cow milk -: Comparison between electrospray and atmospheric pressure photoionization sources [J].
Cavaliere, C ;
Foglia, P ;
Pastorini, E ;
Samperi, R ;
Laganà, A .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2006, 1101 (1-2) :69-78
[8]   Performance comparison of electrospray ionization and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization in untargeted and targeted liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry based metabolomics analysis of grapeberry metabolites [J].
Commisso, Mauro ;
Anesi, Andrea ;
Dal Santo, Silvia ;
Guzzo, Flavia .
RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY, 2017, 31 (03) :292-300
[9]   ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE ION SOURCES [J].
Covey, Thomas R. ;
Thomson, Bruce A. ;
Schneider, Bradley B. .
MASS SPECTROMETRY REVIEWS, 2009, 28 (06) :870-897
[10]   MOLECULAR BEAMS OF MACROIONS [J].
DOLE, M ;
MACK, LL ;
HINES, RL .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1968, 49 (05) :2240-&