The Prevalence and Significance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization at Admission in the General ICU Setting: A Meta-Analysis of Published Studies

被引:60
作者
Ziakas, Panayiotis D. [1 ,2 ]
Anagnostou, Theodora [1 ,2 ]
Mylonakis, Eleftherios [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Rhode Isl Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Providence, RI 02903 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Warren Alpert Med Sch, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
colonization; infection; intensive care unit; meta-analysis; methicillin resistant; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE CULTURES; NASAL CARRIAGE; RISK-FACTORS; SUBSEQUENT INFECTION; MRSA; ACQUISITION; REDUCE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a66bb8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the prevalence and significance of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in the ICU and its predictive value for development of methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection. Data Sources: MEDLINE and EMBASE and reference lists of all eligible articles. Study Selection: Studies providing raw data on nasal methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization at ICU admission, published up to February 2013. Analyses were restricted in the general ICU setting. Medical, surgical, and interdisciplinary ICUs were eligible. ICU studies referring solely on highly specialized ICUs populations and reports on methicillin-resistant S. aureus outbreaks were excluded. Data Extraction: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and extrapolated data in a blinded fashion. The two outcomes of interest were the prevalence estimate of methicillin-resistant S. aureus nasal colonization at admission in the ICU and the sensitivity/specificity of colonization in predicting methicillin-resistant S. aureus-associated infections. Data Synthesis: Meta-analysis, using a random-effect model, and meta-regression were performed. Pooled data extracted from 63,740 evaluable ICU patients provided an estimated prevalence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus nasal colonization at admission of 7.0% (95% CI, 5.8-8.3). Prevalence was higher for North American studies (8.9%; 95% CI, 7.1-10.7) and for patients screened using polymerase chain reaction (14.0%; 95% CI, 9.6-19). A significant per year increase in methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization was also noted. In 17,738 evaluable patients, methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections (4.1%; 95% CI, 2.0-6.8) developed in 589 patients. The relative risk for colonized patients was 8.33 (95% CI, 3.61-19.20). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus nasal carriage had a high specificity (0.96; 95% CI, 0.90-0.98) but low sensitivity (0.32; 95% CI, 0.20-0.48) to predict methicillin-resistant S. aureus-associated infections, with corresponding positive and negative predictive values at 0.25 (95% CI, 0.11-0.39) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.83-1.00), respectively. Conclusions: Among ICU patients, 5.8-8.3% of patients are colonized by methicillin-resistant S. aureus at admission, with a significant upward trend. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization is associated with a more than eight-fold increase in the risk of associated infections during ICU stay, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus infection develops in one fourth of patients who are colonized with methicillin-resistant S. aureus at admission to the ICU.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 444
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
[11]   Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage as a marker for subsequent staphylococcal infections in intensive care unit patients [J].
Corbella, X ;
Dominguez, MA ;
Pujol, M ;
Ayats, J ;
Sendra, M ;
Pallares, R ;
Ariza, J ;
Gudiol, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 16 (05) :351-357
[12]   Effect on MRSA transmission of rapid PCR testing of patients admitted to critical care [J].
Cunningham, R. ;
Jenks, P. ;
Northwood, J. ;
Wallis, M. ;
Ferguson, S. ;
Hunt, S. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 65 (01) :24-28
[13]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection [J].
Davis, KA ;
Stewart, JJ ;
Crouch, HK ;
Florez, CE ;
Hospenthal, DR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (06) :776-782
[14]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[15]   MRSA prevalence in european healthcare settings: a review [J].
Dulon, Madeleine ;
Haamann, Frank ;
Peters, Claudia ;
Schablon, Anja ;
Nienhaus, Albert .
BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2011, 11
[16]   Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis [J].
Duval, S ;
Tweedie, R .
BIOMETRICS, 2000, 56 (02) :455-463
[17]   Evidence-based Radiology: Step 3-Diagnostic Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (Critical Appraisal) [J].
Dwamena, Ben A. .
SEMINARS IN ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 44 (03) :170-179
[18]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[19]   Prevalence and Risk Factors of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization among Critically Ill Hospitalized Patients in a Tertiary Care Center in Houston, Texas: An Active Surveillance Pilot Project [J].
Espinoza, Carolina ;
Fisher, Virgie ;
Jean, Willine ;
Gaines, Barbara ;
Davis, Koya ;
Wanger, Audrey ;
Brown, Eric ;
Slomka, Jacquelyn ;
Ostrosky-Zeichner, Luis .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (01) :93-95
[20]   The Prevalence of Mental Disorders among the Homeless in Western Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis [J].
Fazel, Seena ;
Khosla, Vivek ;
Doll, Helen ;
Geddes, John .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2008, 5 (12) :1670-1681