Influence of pathogen and focus of infection on procalcitonin values in sepsis patients with bacteremia or candidemia

被引:90
|
作者
Thomas-Rueddel, Daniel O. [1 ,2 ]
Poidinger, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
Kott, Matthias [3 ]
Weiss, Manfred [4 ]
Reinhart, Konrad [1 ,2 ]
Bloos, Frank [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jena Univ Hosp, Ctr Sepsis Control & Care, Jena, Germany
[2] Jena Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Klinikum 1, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[3] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ Hosp, Sch Med, Clin Anaesthesiol, Ulm, Germany
关键词
Procalcitonin; Gram-negative bacteria; Gram-positive bacteria; Sepsis; Bacteremia; Focal infection; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTEREMIA; INFLAMMATORY RESPONSE; SEPTIC SHOCK; ETIOLOGY; MARKER; MANAGEMENT; GUIDELINES; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-018-2050-9
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) serum concentrations to diagnose Gram-negative bacteremia and the association of PCT serum concentrations with more specific pathogens and the focus of infection. Methods: Secondary analysis of the prospectively collected patient-level dataset from a cluster randomized quality improvement trial was performed. The trial included sepsis patients with organ dysfunction treated in the participating intensive care units from 2011 to 2015. Test performance for the prediction of Gram-negative bacteremia was assessed by receiver operating curve analysis. Independent effects of specific pathogen groups and foci of infection on PCT concentrations were assessed by linear logistic regression models. Results: Blood cultures (BC) and PCT concentrations had been taken in 4858 of 6561 documented patients. PCT was significantly higher in Gram-negative bacteremia compared to Gram-positive bacteremia or candidemia (p < 0.001). The area under the curve was 0.72 (95% confidence interval 0.71-0.74) for the prediction of Gram-negative bacteremia compared to all other blood culture results including negative blood cultures. The optimized cutoff value was 10 ng/ml (sensitivity 69%, specificity 35%). PCT differed significantly between specific groups of pathogens (p < 0.001) with highest concentrations in Escherichia coli, Streptococcus species and other Enterobacteriaceae. PCT was highest in urogenital followed by abdominal infection and lowest in respiratory infection (p < 0.001). In a linear regression model, Streptococci, E. coli and other Enterobacteriaceae detected from BC were associated with three times higher PCT values. Urogenital or abdominal foci of infection were associated with twofold increased PCT values independent of the pathogen. Conclusions: Serum PCT concentrations are higher in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia than in patients with Gram-positive bacteremia or candidemia. However, the discriminatory power of this difference is too low to guide therapeutic decisions. Variations in PCT serum concentrations are not determined solely by Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria but are also affected by distinct groups of pathogens and different foci of infection.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Influence of pathogen and focus of infection on procalcitonin values in sepsis patients with bacteremia or candidemia
    Daniel O. Thomas-Rüddel
    Bernhard Poidinger
    Matthias Kott
    Manfred Weiss
    Konrad Reinhart
    Frank Bloos
    Critical Care, 22
  • [2] Predicting bacteremia by procalcitonin levels in patients evaluated for sepsis in the emergency department
    Albrich, Werner C.
    Mueller, Beat
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2011, 9 (06) : 653 - 656
  • [3] Ability of serum procalcitonin to distinguish focus of infection and pathogen types in patients with bloodstream infection
    Leng, Yinzhi
    Chen, Caiyun
    Zhang, Yongxiang
    Luo, Can
    Liu, Bo
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2019, 7 (07)
  • [4] Procalcitonin Is a Marker of Gram-Negative Bacteremia in Patients With Sepsis
    Guo, Shun Yuan
    Zhou, Yin
    Hu, Qing Feng
    Yao, Jiong
    Wang, Hong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 349 (06) : 499 - 504
  • [5] Evaluation of the relationship between procalcitonin level and the causative pathogen in intensive care patients with sepsis
    Bilgin, Melek
    Aci, Recai
    Keskin, Adem
    Yilmaz, Esmeray M.
    Polat, Ebru
    FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2023, 18 (13) : 875 - 883
  • [6] Ability of lactate, procalcitonin, and criteria defining sepsis to predict 30-day mortality, bacteremia, and microbiologically confirmed infection in patients with infection suspicion treated in emergency departments
    Rubio-Diaz, Rafael
    Julian-Jimenez, Agustin
    Gonzalez del Castillo, Juan
    Jorge Garcia-Lamberechts, Eric
    Huarte Sanz, Itziar
    Navarro Bustos, Carmen
    Candel Gonzalez, Francisco Javier
    Beneyto Martin, Pedro
    EMERGENCIAS, 2022, 34 (03): : 181 - 189
  • [7] The Relationship Between Sepsis Foci and Procalcitonin Values in Intensive Care Patients
    Kara, Iskender
    Undar, Hasan Nabi
    Seven, Filiz
    Kalem, Fatma
    Ural, Gaye
    Cicekci, Faruk
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL & INTENSIVE CARE, 2020, 11 (02): : 42 - 49
  • [8] Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and C reactive protein for infection and sepsis in elderly patients
    Zincircioglu, Ciler
    Rollas, Kazim
    Guldogan, Isil
    Saritas, Aykut
    Ozkarakas, Huseyin
    Ersan, Gursel
    Senoglu, Nimet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 51 (05) : 2649 - 2656
  • [9] Diagnostic performance of procalcitonin for bacteremia in patients with bacterial infection at the emergency department
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Tan, Che-Kim
    Chen, Shey-Ying
    Wang, Cheng-Yi
    Liu, Wei-Lun
    Hou, Ching-Cheng
    Hsueh, Po-Ren
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION, 2010, 61 (06) : 512 - 515
  • [10] COMPARISON AMONG PRESEPSIN, PROCALCITONIN, AND C-REACTIVE PROTEIN IN PREDICTING BLOOD CULTURE POSITIVITY AND PATHOGEN IN SEPSIS PATIENTS
    Xiao, Hongli
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Wang, Guoxing
    Wang, Yan
    Tan, Zhimin
    Sun, Xuelian
    Zhou, Jie
    Duan, Meili
    Zhi, Deyuan
    Hang, Chenchen
    Zhang, Guoqiang
    Li, Yan
    Wu, Caijun
    Zhang, Haiyan
    Xie, Miaorong
    Li, Chunsheng
    SHOCK, 2024, 61 (03): : 387 - 394