First-Level Transitivity Rule Method for Filling in Incomplete Pair-Wise Comparison Matrices in the Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:10
作者
Srdjevic, Bojan [1 ]
Srdjevic, Zorica [1 ]
Blagojevic, Bosko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Novi Sad, Fac Agr, Dept Water Management, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia
来源
APPLIED MATHEMATICS & INFORMATION SCIENCES | 2014年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
Analytic hierarchy process; comparison matrix; empty entries; transitivity; ESTIMATING WEIGHTS; AHP;
D O I
10.12785/amis/080202
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
The paper discusses the problem of performing the prioritization of decision elements within the multicriteria optimization method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), with incomplete information. An approach is proposed on how to fill in the gap in the pair-wise comparison matrix generated within an AHP standard procedure; that is, to reproduce one missing judgment of the decision maker while assuring the reproduced judgment belongs to the same ratio scale used while other judgments are elicited. The first-level transitivity rule (FLTR) approach is proposed based on screening matrix entries in the neighborhood of a missing one. Scaling (where necessary) and geometric averaging of screened entries allows filling of the gap in the matrix and later prioritization of involved decision elements by the eigenvector, or any other known method. Illustrative examples are provided to compare the proposed method with the other two known methods also aimed to fill-in gaps in AHP matrices. The results indicate some similarities in attaining consistency. However, unlike other methods, the FLTR assures coherency of the generating process in a sense that all numeric values in a matrix (original entries, plus one generated) come from the same ratio scale and have correct element-wise semantic equivalents.
引用
收藏
页码:459 / 467
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Estimation of missing judgments in AHP pairwise matrices using a neural network-based model [J].
Antonio Gomez-Ruiz, Jose ;
Karanik, Marcelo ;
Ignacio Pelaez, Jose .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2010, 216 (10) :2959-2975
[2]   Deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Barzilai, J .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (12) :1226-1232
[3]   On optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices [J].
Bozoki, Sandor ;
Fulop, Janos ;
Ronyai, Lajos .
MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2010, 52 (1-2) :318-333
[4]   Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process [J].
Chandran, B ;
Golden, B ;
Wasil, E .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2005, 32 (09) :2235-2254
[5]  
Chen Q., 2011, TEXTS ENCY OPTIMIZAT, V2, P27
[6]   A NOTE ON THE ANALYSIS OF SUBJECTIVE JUDGMENT MATRICES [J].
CRAWFORD, G ;
WILLIAMS, C .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 29 (04) :387-405
[7]   Incomplete pairwise comparison and consistency optimization [J].
Fedrizzi, Michele ;
Giove, Silvio .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 183 (01) :303-313
[8]   THE THEORY OF RATIO SCALE ESTIMATION - SAATY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
HARKER, PT ;
VARGAS, LG .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1987, 33 (11) :1383-1403
[9]   ALTERNATIVE MODES OF QUESTIONING IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
HARKER, PT .
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 9 (3-5) :353-360
[10]   INCOMPLETE PAIRWISE COMPARISONS IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
HARKER, PT .
MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 1987, 9 (11) :837-848