A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion

被引:19
作者
Ahrens, Steffen [1 ]
Pirschel, Inske [2 ]
Snower, Dennis J. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Str 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] Swiss Natl Bank, Borsenstr 15, CH-8022 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Kiel Inst World Econ, Kiellinie 66, D-24105 Kiel, Germany
[4] Univ Kiel, Wilhelm Seelig Pl 1, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[5] CEPR, London, England
[6] IZA, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Price sluggishness; Loss aversion; State-dependent pricing; REFERENCE-DEPENDENT PREFERENCES; KINKED DEMAND CURVE; MONEY-SUPPLY SHOCKS; MONETARY-POLICY; SETTING BEHAVIOR; REFERENCE POINTS; MENU COSTS; INTERNATIONAL EVIDENCE; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; BUSINESS-CYCLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebo.2016.12.008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present a new partial equilibrium theory of price adjustment, based on consumer loss aversion. In line with prospect theory, the consumers' perceived utility losses from price increases are weighted more heavily than the perceived utility gains from price decreases of equal magnitude. Price changes are evaluated relative to an endogenous reference price, which depends on the consumers' rational price expectations from the recent past. By implication, demand responses are more elastic for price increases than for price decreases and thus firms face a downward-sloping demand curve that is kinked at the consumers' reference price. Firms adjust their prices flexibly in response to variations in this demand curve, in the context of an otherwise standard dynamic neoclassical model of monopolistic competition. The resulting theory of price adjustment is starkly at variance with past theories. We find that- in line with the empirical evidence- prices are more sluggish upwards than downwards in response to temporary demand shocks, while they are more sluggish downwards than upwards in response to permanent demand shocks. The degree of these asymmetries, in turn, depends on the size of the shock. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 95
页数:18
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]   Downward wage rigidity and business cycle asymmetries [J].
Abbritti, Mirko ;
Fahr, Stephan .
JOURNAL OF MONETARY ECONOMICS, 2013, 60 (07) :871-886
[2]   Reference Points and Effort Provision [J].
Abeler, Johannes ;
Falk, Armin ;
Goette, Lorenz ;
Huffman, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (02) :470-492
[3]   Modelling OECD industrial energy demand: Asymmetric price responses and energy-saving technical change [J].
Adeyemi, Olutomi I. ;
Hunt, Lester C. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2007, 29 (04) :693-709
[4]  
Ahrens S, 2015, 1977 KEIL I WORLD EC
[5]  
Alvarez Luis J., 2005, WORKING PAPER SERIES, V538
[6]  
Amirault D., 2005, SURVEY PRICE SETTING, P29
[7]   Microfoundations of macroeconomic price adjustment: Survey evidence from Swedish firms [J].
Apel, M ;
Friberg, R ;
Hallsten, K .
JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2005, 37 (02) :313-338
[8]  
Aucremanne Luc, 2005, WORKING PAPER SERIES, V448
[9]   ASYMMETRIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT AND ECONOMIC-FLUCTUATIONS [J].
BALL, L ;
MANKIW, NG .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1994, 104 (423) :247-261
[10]  
BALL L, 1988, BROOKINGS PAP ECO AC, P1