The relationship between trunk and pelvis kinematics during pregnancy trimesters

被引:9
作者
ElDeeb, Abeer M. [1 ]
Hamada, Hamada A. [2 ]
Abdel-Aziem, Amr A. [2 ]
Youssef, Amel M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, Dept Phys Therapy Womens Hlth, Giza, Giza Governorat, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Phys Therapy, Dept Biomech, Giza, Giza Governorat, Egypt
关键词
pregnancy; pelvis; motion analysis; trunk; LOW-BACK-PAIN; LUMBAR SPINE; GAIT; PARAMETERS; MOTION; COORDINATION; MOVEMENTS; WALKING; BALANCE;
D O I
10.5277/ABB-00544-2016-03
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pregnancy is characterized by many musculoskeletal changes that affect daily living activities and walking. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pregnancy on pelvic and trunk kinematics, and their relationship during the three pregnancy trimesters. Methods: Three-dimensional pelvis and trunk motions were measured using Qualisys Gait Analysis System in the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy. The maximum anterior pelvic tilt and maximum trunk flexion during stance phase, pelvic tilt, obliquity and rotation, as well as trunk flexion-extension, lateral bending and rotation were measured. Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance showed a significant increase in the maximum anterior pelvic tilt during stance phase (p = 0.005), and a significant decrease in the pelvic obliquity (p = 0.011), maximum trunk flexion during stance phase (p = 0.0006), trunk lateral bending (p = 0.005) and trunk rotation (p = 0.004). A significant negative correlation was found between maximum anterior pelvic tilt and maximum trunk flexion in the first (r = -0.72, p = 0.008), second (r = -0.61, p = 0.03), and third (r = -0.61, p = 0.03) trimesters of pregnancy. Also, there was a significant positive correlation found between pelvic obliquity and trunk lateral bending in the first (r = 0.76, p = 0.04), second (r = 0.59, p = 0.04), and third (r = 0.59, p = 0.04) trimesters of pregnancy. Conclusions: The pregnant women walk with an increased maximum anterior pelvic tilt, a decreased maximum trunk flexion, a decreased pelvic obliquity, as well as a decreased trunk lateral bending and rotation. Pregnancy does not affect the relationship between pelvis and trunk motions.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Temporal and spatial parameters of gait during pregnancy
    Bertuit, Jeanne
    Feipel, Veronique
    Rooze, Marcel
    [J]. ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS, 2015, 17 (02) : 93 - 101
  • [2] The effect of pregnancy on footprint parameters - A prospective investigation
    Bird, AR
    Menz, HB
    Hyde, CC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 89 (08): : 405 - 409
  • [3] Branislava ML, 2013, J CHEM, V2013, P9, DOI DOI 10.1155/2013/121024
  • [4] Butler E.E., 2006, HUMAN WALKING
  • [5] Kinematic aspects of trunk motion and gender effect in normal adults
    Chung, Chin Youb
    Park, Moon Seok
    Lee, Sang Hyeong
    Kong, Se Jin
    Lee, Kyoung Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 7
  • [6] Back pain and pregnancy - Active management strategies
    Colliton, J
    [J]. PHYSICIAN AND SPORTSMEDICINE, 1996, 24 (07) : 89 - 93
  • [7] Gait coordination in pregnancy: A study in a rural population in Africa
    Falola, J. M.
    Gouthon, P.
    Koussihouede, F. E.
    Agossa, B.
    Brisswalter, J.
    [J]. SCIENCE & SPORTS, 2009, 24 (01) : 49 - 51
  • [8] Three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbar spine during treadmill walking at different speeds
    Feipel, V
    De Mesmaeker, T
    Klein, P
    Rooze, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2001, 10 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [9] Quantitative comparison of five current protocols in gait analysis
    Ferrari, Alberto
    Benedetti, Maria Grazia
    Pavan, Esteban
    Frigo, Carlo
    Bettinelli, Dario
    Rabuffetti, Marco
    Crenna, Paolo
    Leardini, Alberto
    [J]. GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 28 (02) : 207 - 216
  • [10] Changes of kinematic gait parameters due to pregnancy
    Forczek, Wanda
    Staszkiewicz, Robert
    [J]. ACTA OF BIOENGINEERING AND BIOMECHANICS, 2012, 14 (04) : 113 - 119