Lessons learnt from ITER safety & licensing for DEMO and future nuclear fusion facilities

被引:57
作者
Taylor, Neill [1 ]
Cortes, Pierre [2 ]
机构
[1] EURATOM CCFE Fus Assoc, Culham Sci Ctr, Abingdon OX14 3DB, Oxon, England
[2] ITER Org, F-13115 St Paul Les Durance, France
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Safety; Licensing; Environmental impact; ITER; DEMO; POWER-PLANT;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2013.12.030
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
One of the strong motivations for pursuing the development of fusion energy is its potentially low environmental impact and very good safety performance. But this safety and environmental potential can only be fully realized by careful design choices. For DEMO and other fusion facilities that will require nuclear licensing, S&E objectives and criteria should be set at an early stage and taken into account when choosing basic design options and throughout the design process. Studies in recent decades of the safety of fusion power plant concepts give a useful basis on which to build the S&E approach and to assess the impact of design choices. The experience of licensing ITER is of particular value, even though there are some important differences between ITER and DEMO. The ITER project has developed a safety case, produced a preliminary safety report and had it examined by the French nuclear safety authorities, leading to the licence to construct the facility. The key technical issues that arose during this process are recalled, particularly those that may also have an impact on DEMO safety. These include issues related to postulated accident scenarios, environmental releases during operation, occupational radiation exposure, and radioactive waste. (C) 2014 EURATOM/Culham Centre for Fusion Energy. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1995 / 2000
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   European fusion power plant studies [J].
Cook, I ;
Maisonnier, D ;
Taylor, NP ;
Ward, DJ ;
Sardain, P ;
Di Pace, L ;
Giancarli, L ;
Hermsmeyer, S ;
Norajitra, P ;
Forrest, R .
FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 47 (03) :384-392
[2]   Optimization at the design phase of the potential impact of ITER on workers, the public and the environment [J].
Cortes, Pierre ;
Taylor, Neill ;
Rosanvallon, Sandrine ;
Rodriguez-Rodrigo, Lina ;
Elbez-Uzan, Joelle ;
Iseli, Markus ;
Ciattaglia, Sergio .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2010, 85 (10-12) :2263-2267
[3]   The ITER tritium systems [J].
Glugla, M. ;
Antipenkov, A. ;
Beloglazov, S. ;
Caldwell-Nlchols, C. ;
Cristescu, I. R. ;
Cristescu, I. ;
Day, C. ;
Doerr, L. ;
Girard, J. -P. ;
Tada, E. .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2007, 82 (5-14) :472-487
[4]   The European power plant conceptual study [J].
Maisonnier, D ;
Cook, I ;
Pierre, S ;
Lorenzo, B ;
Edgar, B ;
Karin, B ;
Luigi, DP ;
Robin, F ;
Luciano, G ;
Stephan, H ;
Claudio, N ;
Prachai, N ;
Aldo, P ;
Neill, T ;
David, W .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2005, 75-79 :1173-1179
[5]   The safety implications of tokamak dust size and surface area [J].
McCarthy, KA ;
Petti, DA ;
Carmack, WJ ;
Smolik, GR .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1998, 42 :45-52
[6]   UPDATED MODELING OF POSTULATED ACCIDENT SCENARIOS IN ITER [J].
Reyes, Susana ;
Topilski, Leonid ;
Taylor, Neill ;
Merrill, Brad J. ;
Sponton, Lise-Lotte .
FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 56 (02) :789-793
[7]  
Smolik G.R., 1997, ITERUS97TESA2 INEEL
[8]   PROGRESS IN THE SAFETY AND LICENSING OF ITER [J].
Taylor, Neill ;
Alejaldre, Carlos ;
Cortes, Pierre .
FUSION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 64 (02) :111-117
[9]   ITER safety and licensing update [J].
Taylor, Neill ;
Ciattaglia, Sergio ;
Cortes, Pierre ;
Iseli, Markus ;
Rosanvallon, Sandrine ;
Topilski, Leonid .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2012, 87 (5-6) :476-481
[10]   Updated safety analysis of ITER [J].
Taylor, Neill ;
Baker, Dennis ;
Ciattaglia, Sergio ;
Cortes, Pierre ;
Elbez-Uzan, Joelle ;
Iseli, Markus ;
Reyes, Susana ;
Rodriguez-Rodrigo, Lina ;
Rosanvallon, Sandrine ;
Topilski, Leonid .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2011, 86 (6-8) :619-622