Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century

被引:134
作者
Berke, PR [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1177/088122017001002
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
The practice and scholarship of planning has shifted from physical design to process. Process emphasizes diversity, openness, and consensus but is not fully equipped to offer a shared vision in political arenas dominated by fragmentation and conflict. New urbanism has revived the idea that planning is about physical design, but this concept does not fully embrace a holistic vision of community building. This article explains how sustainable development extends the positive attributes of the first two approaches and offers a multigenerational vision of community building. This vision integrates multiple societal values and enhances local imagination, understanding, and commitment to defining solutions for the common good.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 36
页数:16
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Altshuler A.A., 1965, CITY PLANNING PROCES
[2]  
*AM PLANN ASS, 1998, 480481 PAS AM PLANN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, LAND COULD BE ENV DE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1998, The Regionalist
[5]  
[Anonymous], SUST AM NEW CONS PRO
[6]   Stated preference for pedestrian proximity: An assessment of new urbanist sense of community [J].
Audirac, I .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 1999, 19 (01) :53-66
[7]  
Banfield Edward C., 1955, Politics, Planning and the Public Interest
[8]  
Beatley T., 1998, ECOLOGY PLACE PLANNI
[9]  
Beatley T., 2000, Green urbanism: Learning from European cities
[10]  
Bellah Robert., 1996, Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life