Mammographic quantitative image analysis and biologic image composition for breast lesion characterization and classification

被引:13
作者
Drukker, Karen [1 ]
Duewer, Fred [2 ]
Giger, Maryellen L. [1 ]
Malkov, Serghei [2 ]
Flowers, Chris I. [3 ]
Joe, Bonnie [2 ]
Kerlikowske, Karla [2 ]
Drukteinis, Jennifer S. [4 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Shepherd, John A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Radiol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] Univ S Florida, Dept Radiol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
[4] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Radiol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
4 compartment breast imaging; dual-energy mammography; breast cancer; quantitative; image analysis; computer-aided diagnosis; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY; CANCER; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER; DENSITY; BENIGN; COHORT;
D O I
10.1118/1.4866221
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate whether biologic image composition of mammographic lesions can improve upon existing mammographic quantitative image analysis (QIA) in estimating the probability of malignancy. Methods: The study population consisted of 45 breast lesions imaged with dual-energy mammography prior to breast biopsy with final diagnosis resulting in 10 invasive ductal carcinomas, 5 ductal carcinoma in situ, 11 fibroadenomas, and 19 other benign diagnoses. Analysis was threefold: (1) The raw low-energy mammographic images were analyzed with an established in-house QIA method, "QIA alone," (2) the three-compartment breast (3CB) composition measure-derived from the dual-energy mammography-of water, lipid, and protein thickness were assessed, "3CB alone", and (3) information from QIA and 3CB was combined, "QIA + 3CB." Analysis was initiated from radiologist-indicated lesion centers and was otherwise fully automated. Steps of the QIA and 3CB methods were lesion segmentation, characterization, and subsequent classification for malignancy in leave-one-case-out cross-validation. Performance assessment included box plots, Bland-Altman plots, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions (invasive and DCIS) was 0.81 (standard error 0.07) for the "QIA alone" method, 0.72 (0.07) for "3CB alone" method, and 0.86 (0.04) for "QIA+ 3CB" combined. The difference in AUC was 0.043 between "QIA + 3CB" and "QIA alone" but failed to reach statistical significance (95% confidence interval [-0.17 to + 0.26]). Conclusions: In this pilot study analyzing the new 3CB imaging modality, knowledge of the composition of breast lesions and their periphery appeared additive in combination with existing mammographic QIA methods for the distinction between different benign and malignant lesion types. (c) 2014 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review
    Azavedo, Edward
    Zackrisson, Sophia
    Mejare, Ingegerd
    Arnlind, Marianne Heibert
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 12
  • [2] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [3] In vivo absorption, scattering, and physiologic properties of 58 malignant breast tumors determined by broadband diffuse optical spectroscopy
    Cerussi, Albert
    Shah, Natasha
    Hsiang, David
    Durkin, Amanda
    Butler, John
    Tromberg, Bruce J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2006, 11 (04)
  • [4] Performance of breast ultrasound computer-aided diagnosis: Dependence on image selection
    Gruszauskas, Nicholas P.
    Drukker, Karen
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Sennett, Charlene A.
    Pesce, Lorenzo L.
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2008, 15 (10) : 1234 - 1245
  • [5] Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: Observer study results on an independent clinical data set
    Horsch, Karla
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Vyborny, Carl J.
    Lan, Li
    Mendelson, Ellen B.
    Hendrick, R. Edward
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 240 (02) : 357 - 368
  • [6] Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Recall or Biopsy Recommendation After 10 Years of Screening Mammography A Cohort Study
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Flowers, Chris I.
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (08) : 481 - U46
  • [7] Breast cancer: Effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis - Observer study with independent database of mammograms
    Huo, ZM
    Giger, ML
    Vyborny, CJ
    Metz, CE
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (02) : 560 - 568
  • [8] Computerized classification of benign and malignant masses on digitized mammograms: A study of robustness
    Huo, ZM
    Giger, ML
    Vyborny, CJ
    Wolverton, DE
    Metz, CE
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2000, 7 (12) : 1077 - 1084
  • [9] Outcomes of Screening Mammography by Frequency, Breast Density, and Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Zhu, Weiwei
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Geller, Berta
    Dittus, Kim
    Braithwaite, Dejana
    Wernli, Karen J.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    O'Meara, Ellen S.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (09) : 807 - 816
  • [10] Comparative Effectiveness of Digital Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Community Practice in the United States A Cohort Study
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Hubbard, Rebecca A.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    Geller, Berta M.
    Yankaskas, Bonnie C.
    Lehman, Constance D.
    Taplin, Stephen H.
    Sickles, Edward A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (08) : 493 - U64