Effect of Chlorhexidine in Preventing Plaque Biofilm on Healing Abutment: A Crossover Controlled Study

被引:19
作者
Bressan, Eriberto [1 ]
Tessarolo, Francesco [2 ,3 ]
Sbricoli, Luca
Caola, Iole [4 ]
Nollo, Giandomenico [2 ,3 ]
Di Fiore, Adolfo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Neurosci, Inst Clin Dent, I-35100 Padua, Italy
[2] Bruno Kessler Fdn, Healthcare Res & Innovat Program IRCS, Trento, Italy
[3] Univ Trent, Dept Ind Engn, Trento, Italy
[4] APSS, Dept Lab Med, Trento, Italy
关键词
dental plaque; dental implant; chlorhexidine; healing abutment; scanning electron microscopy; PERI-IMPLANT TISSUES; 0.12-PERCENT; 0.2-PERCENT;
D O I
10.1097/ID.0000000000000018
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Introduction:The study aimed at evaluating the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) in preventing plaque biofilm (PB) formation on healing abutments (HAs) in patients rehabilitated with osseointegrated implants.Materials and Methods:Fifty HAs were placed in 34 voluntary patients 1 week after implant surgery (test group). After 7 days, a new set of 50 HAs was placed in the same implant sites and removed 1 week after (control group). During the 2 testing periods, patients were instructed to apply: CHX mouth rinsing twice daily and no brushing (test); no CHX mouth rinsing and no brushing (control). Scanning electron microscopy and image analysis were blindly used to objectively quantify PB amount on removed HAs.Results:Median values and interquartile ranges of the percent ratio of titanium surface covered from PB were 0.9 (0.1-4.1) and 1.2 (0.1-11.6) for test and control groups, respectively (P = 0.0275).Conclusions:CHX mouth rinsing significantly limited plaque formation on HAs, being a valid contribution to mechanical brushing in early phases of plaque control on dental implants.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 68
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] ADDY M, 1991, Clinical Preventive Dentistry, V13, P13
  • [2] Comparative Effect of Chlorhexidine and Some Mouthrinses on Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Titanium Surface
    Baffone, Wally
    Sorgente, Gianfranco
    Campana, Raffaella
    Patrone, Vania
    Sisti, Davide
    Falcioni, Tania
    [J]. CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 62 (02) : 445 - 451
  • [3] The efficacy of 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthrinse compared with 0.2% on plaque accumulation and periodontal parameters: a systematic review
    Berchier, C. E.
    Slot, D. E.
    Van der Weijden, G. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2010, 37 (09) : 829 - 839
  • [4] Introduction to biofilm
    Costerton, JW
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 11 (3-4) : 217 - 221
  • [5] INTRODUCTION TO THE ESEM INSTRUMENT
    DANILATOS, GD
    [J]. MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 1993, 25 (5-6) : 354 - 361
  • [6] Fedel M., 2007, GIT Imaging Microsc, V2, P44
  • [7] FLOTRA L, 1971, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, V79, P119
  • [8] Franco Neto Carlos Alfredo, 2008, Braz. oral res., V22, P139, DOI 10.1590/S1806-83242008000200008
  • [9] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PLAQUE-INHIBITING EFFECT AND RETENTION OF CHLORHEXIDINE IN HUMAN ORAL CAVITY
    GJERMO, P
    BONESVOLL, P
    ROLLA, G
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1974, 19 (11) : 1031 - 1034
  • [10] GJERMO P, 1970, Journal of Periodontal Research, V5, P102, DOI 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1970.tb00700.x