Communicating without nonprofit organizations on nonprofits' social media: Stakeholders' autonomous networks and three types of organizational ties

被引:30
作者
Ihm, Jennifer [1 ]
机构
[1] Kwangwoon Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Autonomous networks; flow ties; nonprofit organization; online stakeholder engagement; representational ties; social media; SELF-CATEGORIZATION; FACEBOOK; INFORMATION; COMMITMENT; COMMUNITY; IDENTITY; BEHAVIOR; OUTCOMES; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1177/1461444819854806
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Research on nonprofit organizations' (NPOs) social media strategies has focused on the dialogic features of social media to improve organization-stakeholder relationships and elicit stakeholder responses. However, NPOs may initiate different types of relationships with their stakeholders on social media (i.e. flow, representational, and affinity). Stakeholders may also create autonomous networks among themselves beyond simply responding to the NPOs. Based on observations of 100 NPOs' and stakeholders' 1-month-Twitter activities, this study captures varying types of NPOs' ties embedded in social media and examines how each type correlates with stakeholders' autonomous networks. The results suggest that each type of tie has a different role in autonomous networks. This study provides a nuanced understanding of diverse networks embedded in social media and sheds light on autonomous networks as distinctive virtual communities for NPOs during this era of transformation in collective action and social change, existing at the intersection of loose organizational coordination and individual autonomy.
引用
收藏
页码:2648 / 2670
页数:23
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Aaker J.L., 2010, The Dragonfly effect: Quick, effective, and powerful ways to use social media to drive social change
  • [2] SOCIAL IDENTITY THEORY AND THE ORGANIZATION
    ASHFORTH, BE
    MAEL, F
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (01) : 20 - 39
  • [3] THE CIVIC SELL Young people, the internet, and ethical consumption
    Banaji, Shakuntala
    Buckingham, David
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2009, 12 (08) : 1197 - 1223
  • [4] THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
    Bennett, W. Lance
    Segerberg, Alexandra
    [J]. INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (05) : 739 - 768
  • [5] Bimber B, 2012, COMMUN SOC POLIT, P1, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511978777
  • [6] Dialogic strategies and outcomes: An analysis of environmental advocacy groups' Facebook profiles
    Bortree, Denise Sevick
    Seltzer, Trent
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2009, 35 (03) : 317 - 319
  • [7] Broom G.M., 1997, J PUBLIC RELAT RES, V9, P83, DOI [10.1207/s1532754xjprr0902, DOI 10.1207/S1532754XJPRR0902]
  • [8] Bryson J.M., 2018, STRATEGIC PLANNING P, V5th
  • [9] Public engagement with nonprofit organizations on Facebook
    Cho, Moonhee
    Schweickart, Tiffany
    Haase, Abigail
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2014, 40 (03) : 565 - 567
  • [10] Ellemers N, 1999, EUR J SOC PSYCHOL, V29, P371, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199903/05)29:2/3<371::AID-EJSP932>3.0.CO