A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density

被引:42
作者
Brentnall, Adam R. [1 ]
van Veen, Elke M. [2 ]
Harkness, Elaine F. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Rafiq, Sajjad [7 ]
Byers, Helen [2 ]
Astley, Susan M. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,10 ]
Sampson, Sarah [3 ,4 ]
Howell, Anthony [3 ,4 ,8 ,10 ]
Newman, William G. [2 ,9 ,10 ]
Cuzick, Jack [1 ]
Evans, Dafydd Gareth R. [2 ,3 ,4 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Canc Prevent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Barts & London, Charterhouse Sq, London, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Evolut & Genom Sci, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Biol Sci,Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Hosp South Manchester, Prevent Breast Canc Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Hosp South Manchester, Nightingale Breast Screening Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Biostat, London, England
[8] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Ctr Genom Med, Manchester, Lancs, England
[10] Univ Manchester, Manchester Breast Ctr, Manchester Canc Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 欧盟地平线“2020”; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
risk prediction; risk stratification; breast cancer; SNPs; Tyrer-Cuzick; breast density; TYRER-CUZICK; WOMEN; VALIDATION; PREVENTION; PREDICTION; ACCURACY; MODELS; PANEL;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.32541
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Panels of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) stratify risk for breast cancer in women from the general population, but studies are needed assess their use in a fully comprehensive model including classical risk factors, mammographic density and more than 100 SNPs associated with breast cancer. A case-control study was designed (1,668 controls, 405 cases) in women aged 47-73 years attending routine screening in Manchester UK, and enrolled in a wider study to assess methods for risk assessment. Risk from classical questionnaire risk factors was assessed using the Tyrer-Cuzick model; mean percentage visual mammographic density was scored by two independent readers. DNA extracted from saliva was genotyped at selected SNPs using the OncoArray. A predefined polygenic risk score based on 143 SNPs was calculated (SNP143). The odds ratio (OR, and 95% confidence interval, CI) per interquartile range (IQ-OR) of SNP143 was estimated unadjusted and adjusted for Tyrer-Cuzick and breast density. Secondary analysis assessed risk by oestrogen receptor (ER) status. The primary polygenic risk score was well calibrated (O/E OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.34) and accuracy was retained after adjustment for Tyrer-Cuzick risk and mammographic density (IQ-OR unadjusted 2.12, 95% CI% 1.75-2.42; adjusted 2.06, 95% CI 1.75-2.42). SNP143 was a risk factor for ER+ and ER- breast cancer (adjusted IQ-OR, ER+ 2.11, 95% CI 1.78-2.51; ER- 1.81, 95% CI 1.16-2.84). In conclusion, polygenic risk scores based on a large number of SNPs improve risk stratification in combination with classical risk factors and mammographic density, and SNP143 was similarly predictive for ER-positive and ER-negative disease.
引用
收藏
页码:2122 / 2129
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Assessing Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Assessment Models [J].
Amir, Eitan ;
Freedman, Orit C. ;
Seruga, Bostjan ;
Evans, D. Gareth .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10) :680-691
[2]   Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature [J].
Anderson, Kristin N. ;
Schwab, Richard B. ;
Martinez, Maria Elena .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 144 (01) :1-10
[3]  
[Anonymous], LANCET ONCOL
[4]  
[Anonymous], MED ONE
[5]  
[Anonymous], IMPROVEMENT RISK PRE
[6]  
[Anonymous], LANCET
[7]  
[Anonymous], SCREEN BREAST CANC
[8]  
[Anonymous], FAM BREAST CANC CLAS
[9]   Is mammographic density differentially associated with breast cancer according to receptor status? A meta-analysis [J].
Antoni, Sebastien ;
Sasco, Annie J. ;
Silva, Isabel dos Santos ;
McCormack, Valerie .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 137 (02) :337-347
[10]   Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK [J].
Brentnall, A. R. ;
Evans, D. G. ;
Cuzick, J. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (03) :827-828