A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density

被引:39
作者
Brentnall, Adam R. [1 ]
van Veen, Elke M. [2 ]
Harkness, Elaine F. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Rafiq, Sajjad [7 ]
Byers, Helen [2 ]
Astley, Susan M. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ,10 ]
Sampson, Sarah [3 ,4 ]
Howell, Anthony [3 ,4 ,8 ,10 ]
Newman, William G. [2 ,9 ,10 ]
Cuzick, Jack [1 ]
Evans, Dafydd Gareth R. [2 ,3 ,4 ,8 ,9 ,10 ]
机构
[1] Queen Mary Univ London, Ctr Canc Prevent, Wolfson Inst Prevent Med, Barts & London, Charterhouse Sq, London, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Div Evolut & Genom Sci, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Biol Sci,Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Hosp South Manchester, Prevent Breast Canc Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Univ Hosp South Manchester, Nightingale Breast Screening Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Div Informat Imaging & Data Sci, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[7] Imperial Coll London, Sch Publ Hlth Epidemiol & Biostat, London, England
[8] Christie NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester, Lancs, England
[9] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Ctr Genom Med, Manchester, Lancs, England
[10] Univ Manchester, Manchester Breast Ctr, Manchester Canc Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院; 欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
risk prediction; risk stratification; breast cancer; SNPs; Tyrer-Cuzick; breast density; WOMEN; PREVENTION; PREDICTION; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; MODELS; PANEL;
D O I
10.1002/ijc.32541
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Panels of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) stratify risk for breast cancer in women from the general population, but studies are needed assess their use in a fully comprehensive model including classical risk factors, mammographic density and more than 100 SNPs associated with breast cancer. A case-control study was designed (1,668 controls, 405 cases) in women aged 47-73 years attending routine screening in Manchester UK, and enrolled in a wider study to assess methods for risk assessment. Risk from classical questionnaire risk factors was assessed using the Tyrer-Cuzick model; mean percentage visual mammographic density was scored by two independent readers. DNA extracted from saliva was genotyped at selected SNPs using the OncoArray. A predefined polygenic risk score based on 143 SNPs was calculated (SNP143). The odds ratio (OR, and 95% confidence interval, CI) per interquartile range (IQ-OR) of SNP143 was estimated unadjusted and adjusted for Tyrer-Cuzick and breast density. Secondary analysis assessed risk by oestrogen receptor (ER) status. The primary polygenic risk score was well calibrated (O/E OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.86-1.34) and accuracy was retained after adjustment for Tyrer-Cuzick risk and mammographic density (IQ-OR unadjusted 2.12, 95% CI% 1.75-2.42; adjusted 2.06, 95% CI 1.75-2.42). SNP143 was a risk factor for ER+ and ER- breast cancer (adjusted IQ-OR, ER+ 2.11, 95% CI 1.78-2.51; ER- 1.81, 95% CI 1.16-2.84). In conclusion, polygenic risk scores based on a large number of SNPs improve risk stratification in combination with classical risk factors and mammographic density, and SNP143 was similarly predictive for ER-positive and ER-negative disease.
引用
收藏
页码:2122 / 2129
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Assessing Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer: A Review of Risk Assessment Models
    Amir, Eitan
    Freedman, Orit C.
    Seruga, Bostjan
    Evans, D. Gareth
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2010, 102 (10): : 680 - 691
  • [2] Reproductive risk factors and breast cancer subtypes: a review of the literature
    Anderson, Kristin N.
    Schwab, Richard B.
    Martinez, Maria Elena
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2014, 144 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [4] [Anonymous], FAM BREAST CANC CLAS
  • [5] Is mammographic density differentially associated with breast cancer according to receptor status? A meta-analysis
    Antoni, Sebastien
    Sasco, Annie J.
    Silva, Isabel dos Santos
    McCormack, Valerie
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 137 (02) : 337 - 347
  • [6] Distribution of breast cancer risk from SNPs and classical risk factors in women of routine screening age in the UK
    Brentnall, A. R.
    Evans, D. G.
    Cuzick, J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 110 (03) : 827 - 828
  • [7] A Case-Control Study to Add Volumetric or Clinical Mammographic Density into the Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Model
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Cohn, Wendy F.
    Knaus, William A.
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING, 2019, 1 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [8] Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Cuzick, Jack
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Bowles, Erin J. Aiello
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (09)
  • [9] Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Harkness, Elaine F.
    Astley, Susan M.
    Donnelly, Louise S.
    Stavrinos, Paula
    Sampson, Sarah
    Fox, Lynne
    Sergeant, Jamie C.
    Harvie, Michelle N.
    Wilson, Mary
    Beetles, Ursula
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Lim, Yit
    Jain, Anil
    Bundred, Sara
    Barr, Nicola
    Reece, Valerie
    Howell, Anthony
    Cuzick, Jack
    Evans, D. Gareth R.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [10] Breast cancer risk models: a comprehensive overview of existing models, validation, and clinical applications
    Cintolo-Gonzalez, Jessica A.
    Braun, Danielle
    Blackford, Amanda L.
    Mazzola, Emanuele
    Acar, Ahmet
    Plichta, Jennifer K.
    Griffin, Molly
    Hughes, Kevin S.
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2017, 164 (02) : 263 - 284