An evaluation of simultaneous and sequential presentation of preferred and nonpreferred food to treat food selectivity

被引:68
作者
Piazza, CC
Patel, MR
Santana, CM
Goh, HL
Delia, MD
Lancaster, BM
机构
[1] Marcus Inst, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
[2] Kennedy Krieger Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
developmental disabilities; establishing operations; food selectivity; negative reinforcement;
D O I
10.1901/jaba.2002.35-259
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In the current investigation, we compared two methods of food presentation (simultaneous vs. sequential) to increase consumption of nonpreferred food for 3 children with food selectivity. In the simultaneous condition, preferred foods were presented at the same time as nonpreferred food (e.g., a piece of broccoli was presented on a chip). In the sequential condition, acceptance of the nonpreferred food resulted in presentation of the preferred food. Increases in consumption occurred immediately during the simultaneous condition for 2 of the 3 participants. For 1 participant, increases in consumption occurred in the simultaneous condition relative to the sequential condition, but only after physical guidance and re-presentation were added to treatment. Finally, consumption increased for 1 participant in the sequential condition, but only after several sessions. These results are discussed in terms of possible mechanisms that may alter preferences for food (i.e., establishing operations, flavor-flavor conditioning).
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 270
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   An alternating treatments comparison of two intensive interventions for food refusal [J].
Ahearn, WH ;
Kerwin, MLE ;
Eicher, PS ;
Shantz, J ;
Swearingin, W .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (03) :321-332
[2]   ACHIEVING AND MAINTAINING COMPLIANCE WITH THE KETOGENIC DIET [J].
AMARI, A ;
GRACE, NC ;
FISHER, WW .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1995, 28 (03) :341-342
[3]  
CAPALDI E, 1989, Q J EXP PSYCHOL-B, V41, P307
[4]  
Capaldi ElizabethD., 1996, WHY WE EAT WHAT WE E, P53
[5]   USE OF COMPONENT ANALYSES TO IDENTIFY ACTIVE VARIABLES IN TREATMENT PACKAGES FOR CHILDREN WITH FEEDING DISORDERS [J].
COOPER, LJ ;
WACKER, DP ;
MCCOMAS, JJ ;
BROWN, K ;
PECK, SM ;
RICHMAN, D ;
DREW, J ;
FRISCHMEYER, P ;
MILLARD, T .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1995, 28 (02) :139-153
[6]  
DAVIS CM, 1939, CANADIAN MED ASS J, V41, P651
[7]   FLAVOR-FLAVOR ASSOCIATIONS INDUCE HEDONIC SHIFTS IN TASTE PREFERENCE [J].
FANSELOW, MS ;
BIRK, J .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1982, 10 (02) :223-228
[8]   ANTICIPATION OF INCENTIVE GAIN [J].
FLAHERTY, CF ;
CHECKE, S .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1982, 10 (02) :177-182
[9]   CONTINGENCY CONTACTING - COMBINING POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT AND ESCAPE EXTINCTION PROCEDURES TO TREAT PERSISTENT FOOD REFUSAL [J].
HOCH, TA ;
BABBITT, RL ;
COE, DA ;
KRELL, DM ;
HACKBERT, L .
BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION, 1994, 18 (01) :106-128
[10]  
HOLMQUIST L, 1975, FOA REPORTS, V9, P1