Analytical evaluation of four faecal immunochemistry tests for haemoglobin

被引:21
作者
Piggott, Carolyn [1 ,2 ]
Carroll, Magdalen R. R. [1 ,2 ]
John, Cerin [1 ,2 ]
O'Driscoll, Shane [1 ,2 ]
Benton, Sally C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] NHS Bowel Canc Screening Programme Southern Hub, Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, 20 Priestley Rd,Surrey Res Pk, Guildford GU2 7YS, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Surrey Cty Hosp, Berkshire & Surrey Pathol Serv, Guildford, Surrey, England
关键词
analytical evaluation; colorectal cancer; faecal immunochemical test; FIT;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2020-0251
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives: Faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) for haemoglobin (Hb) are being used in the investigation of colorectal cancer. These tests use antibodies raised to the globin moiety of human Hb. Here, four automated quantitative FIT systems (HM-JACKarc, NS-Prime, OC-Sensor PLEDIA and SENTiFIT 270) are evaluated analytically to confirm whether the performance of the systems meet the manufacturers' claims. Methods: Assessment of the analytical performance of the FIT systems was undertaken using Hb lysates, real patient samples and external quality assessment (EQA) samples. This analytical assessment focused on detection characteristics, imprecision, linearity, prozone effect, recovery and carryover. Results: All four methods demonstrated good analytical performance, with acceptable within- and between-run imprecision, good recovery of f-Hb and limited carryover of samples. They also all show good linearity across the range of concentrations tested. The results of EQA samples showed different variations from the target values (-52 to 45%), due to the absence of standardisation across the different methods. Conclusions: All four systems are fit for purpose and have an analytical performance as documented by their manufacturers.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 178
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Ahn A, 2016, LAB MED ONLINE, V6, P233
[2]  
Benton S.C., 2017, IFCC E NEWS, P16
[3]   REVISED SCHEME FOR EVALUATION OF AUTOMATIC INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN CLINICAL CHEMISTRY [J].
BROUGHTON, PM ;
GOWENLOCK, AH ;
MCCORMACK, JJ ;
NEILL, DW .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1974, 11 (NOV) :207-218
[4]  
Carroll MR, 2012, EVALUATION QUANTITAT
[5]  
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, 2012, APPR GUID
[6]   Detection capability of quantitative faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT) and reporting of low faecal haemoglobin concentrations [J].
Fraser, Callum G. ;
Benton, Sally C. .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 57 (05) :611-616
[7]   Improving the reporting of evaluations of faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin: the FITTER standard and checklist [J].
Fraser, Callum G. ;
Allison, James E. ;
Young, Graeme P. ;
Halloran, Stephen P. ;
Seaman, Helen E. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2015, 24 (01) :24-26
[8]   Intelligent Use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test in Population-Based Screening [J].
Halloran, Stephen P. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (07) :496-497
[9]   Identifying patients with suspected colorectal cancer in primary care: derivation and validation of an algorithm [J].
Hippisley-Cox, Julia ;
Coupland, Carol .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (594) :e29-e37
[10]   Fecal immunochemical test as a biomarker for inflammatory bowel diseases: can it rival fecal calprotectin? [J].
Kato, Jun ;
Hiraoka, Sakiko ;
Nakarai, Asuka ;
Takashima, Shiho ;
Inokuchi, Toshihiro ;
Ichinose, Masao .
INTESTINAL RESEARCH, 2016, 14 (01) :5-14