Defining SMEs' 4.0 Readiness Indicators

被引:52
作者
Chonsawat, Nilubon [1 ]
Sopadang, Apichat [2 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Grad Program Ind Engn, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Engn, Excellent Ctr Logist & Supply Chain Management, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2020年 / 10卷 / 24期
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
indicators; industry; 4; 0; readiness; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; MATURITY MODEL; INDUSTRY; SMART; INTERNET; FUTURE; PERFORMANCE; CAPABILITY; SYSTEMS; THINGS;
D O I
10.3390/app10248998
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0 revolution offers smart manufacturing; it systematically incorporates production technology and advanced operation management. Adopting these high-state strategies can increase production efficiency, reduce energy consumption, and decrease manufacturer costs. Simultaneously, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) were the backbone of economic growth and development. They still lack both the knowledge and decision-making to verify this high-stage technology's performance and implementation. Therefore, the research aims to define the readiness indicators to assess and support SMEs toward Industry 4.0. The research begins with found aspects that influence the SME 4.0 readiness by using Bibliometric techniques. The result shows the aspects which were the most occurrences such as the Industrial Internet, Cloud Manufacturing, Collaborative Robot, Business Model, and Digital Transformation. They were then grouped into five dimensions by using the visualization of similarities (VOS) techniques: (1) Organizational Resilience, (2) Infrastructure System, (3) Manufacturing System, (4) Data Transformation, and (5) Digital Technology. Cronbach's alpha then validated the composite dimensions at a 0.926 level of reliability and a significant positive correlation. After that, the indicators were defined from the dimension and aspects approach. Finally, the indicators were pilot tested by small enterprises. It appeared that 23 indicators could support SMEs 4.0 readiness indication and decision-making in the context of Industry 4.0.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 30
页数:30
相关论文
共 97 条
[61]   What Drives the Implementation of Industry 4.0? The Role of Opportunities and Challenges in the Context of Sustainability [J].
Mueller, Julian Marius ;
Kiel, Daniel ;
Voigt, Kai-Ingo .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (01)
[62]  
Nemoto Miriam Christi Midori Oishi, 2010, Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, V5, P95
[63]   Analyzing the effects of technological, organizational and competition factors on Web knowledge exchange in SMEs [J].
Palacios-Marques, Daniel ;
Soto-Acosta, Pedro ;
Merigo, Jose M. .
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2015, 32 (01) :23-32
[64]   A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industry 4.0 concept [J].
Pereira, A. C. ;
Romero, F. .
MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE 2017 (MESIC 2017), 2017, 13 :1206-1214
[65]   Transformation strategies for the supply chain: the impact of industry 4.0 and digital transformation [J].
Preindl, Raphael ;
Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos ;
Litsiou, Konstantia .
SUPPLY CHAIN FORUM, 2020, 21 (01) :26-34
[66]  
PRITCHARD A, 1969, J DOC, V25, P348
[67]   Fundamental Theories and Key Technologies for Smart and Optimal Manufacturing in the Process Industry [J].
Qian, Feng ;
Zhong, Weimin ;
Du, Wenli .
ENGINEERING, 2017, 3 (02) :154-160
[68]   Examining the critical success factors of cloud computing adoption in the MSMEs by using ISM model [J].
Raut, Rakesh D. ;
Gardas, Bhaskar B. ;
Jha, Manoj Kumar ;
Priyadarshinee, Pragati .
Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2017, 28 (02) :125-141
[69]   Industry 4.0 as policy-driven discourse to institutionalize innovation systems in manufacturing [J].
Reischauer, Georg .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 132 :26-33
[70]   Developing a fuzzy group AHP model for prioritizing the factors affecting success of High-Tech SME's in Iran: A case study [J].
Sadeghi, Arash ;
Azar, Adel ;
Rad, Ramin Sepehri .
WORLD CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT (BEM-2012), 2012, 62 :957-961