Sensory preservation in neck dissection: outcomes of a sub-sternocleidomastoid approach

被引:2
作者
Honda, Keigo [1 ]
Asato, Ryo [2 ]
Tsuji, Jun [2 ]
Miyazaki, Masakazu [2 ]
Kada, Shinpei [2 ]
Kataoka, Yukiko [2 ]
Taura, Akiko [2 ]
Morita, Mami [2 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Komatsubaradori 4-20, Wakayama, Wakayama 6408269, Japan
[2] Natl Hosp Org Kyoto Med Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
Sensory outcome; neck dissection; preservation; cervical nerve; sub-sternocleidomastoid approach; SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE; CERVICAL PLEXUS; SHOULDER PAIN; CANCER; HEAD;
D O I
10.1080/00016489.2018.1455008
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Cutaneous anesthesia in early postoperative period is common after neck dissection even if the cervical nerve (CN) rootlets are preserved. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the preservation of the terminal branches of CNs using sub-sternocleidomastoid (SCM) approach combined with medially placed skin incision can prevent early postoperative anesthesia. Material and methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 129 neck dissections in 87 head and neck cancer patients. Results: The early postoperative sensory preservation rates for the ear tab, submandibular, lateral neck, and sub-clavicular areas of CN rootlet-preserved necks (n = 86) were 75.6%, 20.9%, 74.4%, and 86.0%, respectively, compared with 37.2%, 2.3%, 2.3%, and 4.7%, respectively, in CN rootlet-resected neck (n = 43). In CN rootlet-preserved necks, the sub-SCM approach (n = 54) showed 81.5%, 27.8%, 92.6%, and 94.4% preservation rates, respectively, compared with 65.6%, 9.4%, 43.8%, and 71.9%, respectively, using the conventional subplatysmal approach (n = 32). The rates were significantly better in the submandibular, lateral neck, and sub-clavicular areas after sub-SCM approach. Conclusions: Preservation of CN rootlets is a required element for sensory preservation in neck dissection. The sub-SCM approach can effectively prevent early postoperative cutaneous anesthesia following CN-preserving neck dissection.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 767
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Agha-Mir-Salim P, 2002, HNO, V50, P544, DOI 10.1007/s00106-001-0587-3
[2]  
BOCCA E, 1984, LARYNGOSCOPE, V94, P942
[3]   Robotic modified radical neck dissection with bilateral axillobreast approach [J].
Choi, June Young ;
Kang, Kyung Ho .
GLAND SURGERY, 2017, 6 (03) :243-249
[4]  
Crile G, 1906, J AMER MED ASSOC, V47, P1780
[5]   The relationship between shoulder pain and damage to the cervical plexus following neck dissection [J].
Dilber, Muhammet ;
Kasapoglu, Fikret ;
Erisen, Levent ;
Basut, Oguz ;
Tezel, Ilker .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2007, 264 (11) :1333-1338
[6]  
Gavilan J, 2004, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, V5, P168
[7]  
Hemmat SM, 2017, INT ARCH OTORHINOLAR, V21, P8, DOI 10.1055/s-0036-1592153
[8]   Oncologic safety of cervical nerve preservation in neck dissection for head and neck cancer [J].
Honda, Keigo ;
Asato, Ryo ;
Tsuji, Jun ;
Miyazaki, Masakazu ;
Kada, Shinpei ;
Tsujimura, Takashi ;
Kataoka, Michiko .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2017, 39 (09) :1751-1755
[9]  
Khafif A., 2004, OPER TECH OTOLARYNGO, V15, P160
[10]   FUNCTIONAL-EVALUATION OF THE SPINAL ACCESSORY NERVE AFTER NECK DISSECTION [J].
LEIPZIG, B ;
SUEN, JY ;
ENGLISH, JL ;
BARNES, J ;
HOOPER, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 146 (04) :526-530