Multipoint High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization of a Transport Aircraft Configuration

被引:177
作者
Kenway, Gaetan K. W. [1 ]
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Aerosp Engn, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] AIAA, Atlanta, GA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT | 2014年 / 51卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大创新基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; FLUID;
D O I
10.2514/1.C032150
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents multipoint high-fidelity aerostructural optimizations of a long-range wide-body transonic transport aircraft configuration. The aerostructural analysis employs Euler computational fluid dynamics with a 2-million-cell mesh and a structural finite-element model with 300,000 degrees of freedom. The coupled adjoint sensitivity method is used to efficiently compute gradients, enabling the use of gradient-based optimization with respect to hundreds of aerodynamic shape and structural sizing variables. The NASA Common Research Model is used as the baseline configuration, together with a wing box structure that was designed for this study. Two design optimization problems are solved: one where takeoff gross weight is minimized, and another where fuel burn is minimized. Each optimization uses a multipoint formulation with five cruise conditions and two maneuver conditions. Each of the optimization problems have 476 design variables, including wing planform, airfoil shape, and structural thickness variables. Optimized results are obtained within 36 h of wall time using 435 processors. The resulting optimal configurations are discussed and analyzed for the aerostructural tradeoffs resulting from each objective. The takeoff gross weight minimization results in a 4.2% reduction in takeoff gross weight with a 6.6% fuel burn reduction, whereas the fuel-burn optimization resulted in an 11.2% fuel burn reduction with no significant change in the takeoff gross weight.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 160
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [51] SOME AEROELASTIC PROPERTIES OF SWEPT WINGS
    PAI, SI
    SEARS, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AERONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 1949, 16 (02): : 105 - &
  • [52] pyOpt: a Python']Python-based object-oriented framework for nonlinear constrained optimization
    Perez, Ruben E.
    Jansen, Peter W.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 45 (01) : 101 - 118
  • [53] Numerical sensitivity analysis for aerodynamic optimization: A survey of approaches
    Peter, Jacques E. V.
    Dwight, Richard P.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2010, 39 (03) : 373 - 391
  • [54] Preliminary aerostructural optimization of a large business jet
    Piperni, P.
    Abdo, M.
    Kafyeke, F.
    Isikveren, Askin T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2007, 44 (05): : 1422 - 1438
  • [55] OPTIMUM DESIGN IN FLUID MECHANICS
    PIRONNEAU, O
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1974, 64 (JUN3) : 97 - 110
  • [56] An adaptive approach to constraint aggregation using adjoint sensitivity analysis
    Poon, Nicholas M. K.
    Martins, Joaquim R. R. A.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2007, 34 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [57] Schmit L.A., 1960, PROC 2 C ELECT COMPU, P105
  • [58] Multidisciplinary aerospace design optimization: survey of recent developments
    SobieszczanskiSobieski, J
    Haftka, RT
    [J]. STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1997, 14 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [59] Torenbeek E., 1990, SYNTHESIS SUBSONIC A, P499
  • [60] van der Weide E., 2006, 20060421 AIAA