Dual-exposure technique for extending the dynamic range of x-ray flat panel detectors

被引:11
作者
Sisniega, A. [1 ,2 ]
Abella, M. [1 ,2 ]
Desco, M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vaquero, J. J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Carlos III Madrid, Dept Bioingn & Ingn Aeroespacial, Madrid, Spain
[2] IiSGM, Madrid, Spain
[3] Ctr Invest Red Salud Mental CIBERSAM, Madrid, Spain
关键词
COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BREAST CT; RADIOGRAPHY; DESIGN; SYSTEM; NOISE;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/59/2/421
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
This work presents an approach to extend the dynamic range of x-ray flat panel detectors by combining two acquisitions of the same sample taken with two different x-ray photon flux levels and the same beam spectral configuration. In order to combine both datasets, the response of detector pixels was modelled in terms of mean and variance using a linear model. The model was extended to take into account the effect of pixel saturation. We estimated a joint probability density function (j-pdf) of the pixel values by assuming that each dataset follows an independent Gaussian distribution. This j-pdf was used for estimating the final pixel value of the high-dynamic-range dataset using amaximum likelihood method. The suitability of the pixel model for the representation of the detector signal was assessed using experimental data from a small-animal cone-beam micro-CT scanner equipped with a flat panel detector. The potential extension in dynamic range offered by our method was investigated for generic flat panel detectors using analytical expressions and simulations. The performance of the proposed dual-exposure approach in realistic imaging environments was compared with that of a regular single-exposure technique using experimental data from two different phantoms. Image quality was assessed in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, and analysis of profiles drawn on the images. The dynamic range, measured as the ratio between the exposure for saturation and the exposure equivalent to instrumentation noise, was increased from 76.9 to 166.7 when using our method. Dual-exposure results showed higher contrast-to-noise ratio and contrast resolution than the single-exposure acquisitions for the same x-ray dose. In addition, image artifacts were reduced in the combined dataset. This technique to extend the dynamic range of the detector without increasing the dose is particularly suited to image samples that contain both low and high attenuation regions.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 439
页数:19
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] A dual micro-CT system for small animal imaging - art. no. 691342
    Badea, C. T.
    Johnston, S.
    Johnson, B.
    Lin, M.
    Hedlund, L. W.
    Johnson, G. Allan
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2008: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, PTS 1-3, 2008, 6913 : 91342 - 91342
  • [2] Dedicated breast CT: Radiation dose and image quality evaluation
    Boone, JM
    Nelson, TR
    Lindfors, KK
    Seibert, JA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 (03) : 657 - 667
  • [3] Clinthorne N. H., 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255), P758, DOI 10.1109/NSSMIC.1998.774285
  • [4] Improving the dynamic range of real-time X-ray imaging systems via Bayesian fusion
    Dromigny, A
    Zhu, YM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, 1997, 16 (03) : 147 - 160
  • [5] PRACTICAL CONE-BEAM ALGORITHM
    FELDKAMP, LA
    DAVIS, LC
    KRESS, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1984, 1 (06): : 612 - 619
  • [6] Fox TR, 2005, US Patent, Patent No. [6901135- B2, 6901135B2]
  • [7] Fox TR, 2005, US Patent, Patent No. [2005047546- A1, 2005047546A1]
  • [8] Greene H.W., 2008, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, V6th
  • [9] Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy
    Jaffray, DA
    Siewerdsen, JH
    Wong, JW
    Martinez, AA
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (05): : 1337 - 1349
  • [10] Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT)
    Kalender, Willi A.
    Kyriakou, Yiannis
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (11) : 2767 - 2779