Conservation Action Planning: Lessons learned from the St. Marys River watershed biodiversity conservation planning process

被引:2
作者
Patterson, Tamatha A. [1 ]
Grundel, Ralph [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Nat Resources & Environm, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Great Lakes Sci Ctr, Porter, IN 46304 USA
关键词
Adaptive management; Connecting channel; Conservation planning; Conservation Action Planning; St. Marys River; St. Marys River watershed;
D O I
10.1016/j.jglr.2013.07.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Conservation Action Planning (CAP) is an adaptive management planning process refined by The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and embraced worldwide as the Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation. The CAP process facilitates open, multi-institutional collaboration on a common conservation agenda through organized actions and quantified results. While specifically designed for conservation efforts, the framework is adaptable and flexible to multiple scales and can be used for any collaborative planning effort. The CAP framework addresses inception; design and development of goals, measures, and strategies; and plan implementation and evaluation. The specific components of the CAP include defining the project scope and conservation targets; assessing the ecological viability; ascertaining threats and surrounding situation; identifying opportunities and designing strategies for action; and implementing actions and monitoring results. In 2007, TNC and a multidisciplinary graduate student team from the University of Michigan's School of Natural Resources and Environment initiated a CAP for the St. Marys River, the connecting channel between Lake Superior and Lake Huron, and its local watershed. The students not only gained experience in conservation planning, but also learned lessons that notably benefited the CAP process and were valuable for any successful collaborative effort a dedicated core team improved product quality, accelerated the timeline, and provided necessary support for ongoing efforts; an academic approach in preparation for engagement in the planning process brought applicable scientific research to the forefront, enhanced workshop facilitation, and improved stakeholder participation; and early and continuous. interactions with regional stakeholders improved cooperation and built a supportive network for collaboration. (C) 2013 International Association for Great Lakes Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 14
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Albert D.A., 2003, Between Land and Lake: Michigan's Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands
  • [2] Conservation Measures Partnership, 2007, OP STAND PRAT CONS V
  • [3] Dudley N., 2007, CONSERVATION ACTION
  • [4] Duffy W.G., 1987, ST MARYS RIVER MICHI
  • [5] Ewert D.N., 1999, GREAT LAKES BIRD ECO
  • [6] Fielder D.G., 2007, POPULATION DYNAMICS
  • [7] Effective conservation planning requires learning and adaptation
    Grantham, Hedley S.
    Bode, Michael
    McDonald-Madden, Eve
    Game, Edward T.
    Knight, Andrew T.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 8 (08) : 431 - 437
  • [8] Groves CR, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P499, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0499:PFBCPC]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Incorporating climate change into systematic conservation planning
    Groves, Craig R.
    Game, Edward T.
    Anderson, Mark G.
    Cross, Molly
    Enquist, Carolyn
    Ferdana, Zach
    Girvetz, Evan
    Gondor, Anne
    Hall, Kimberly R.
    Higgins, Jonathan
    Marshall, Rob
    Popper, Ken
    Schill, Steve
    Shafer, Sarah L.
    [J]. BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2012, 21 (07) : 1651 - 1671