The Source and Robustness of Duties of Friendship

被引:1
作者
Arrell, Robbie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
friendship; associative duties; partiality; value; Keller; Pettit; LOVE;
D O I
10.1080/09672559.2014.896629
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Certain relationships generate associative duties that exhibit robustness across change. It seems insufficient for friendship, for example, if I am only disposed to fulfil duties of friendship towards you as things stand here and now. However, robustness is not required across all variations. Were you to become monstrously cruel towards me, we might expect that my duties of friendship towards you would not be robust across that kind of change. The question then is this: is there any principled way of distinguishing those variations across which robustness of the disposition to fulfil duties of friendship is required from those across which it isn't? In this paper I propose a way of answering this question that invokes distinctions concerning how we value friends and friendships, and how persons and friendships possess value - distinctions that are central to the project of specifying not only the limits of robustness, but also the source of duties of friendship and associative duties more generally.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 183
页数:18
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Dancy J., 2004, Ethics Without Principles
[2]  
Kagan S., 1998, The Journal of Ethics, V2, P277, DOI DOI 10.1023/A:1009782403793
[3]  
Keller Simon., 2013, PARTIALITY
[4]   Love as valuing a relationship [J].
Kolodny, N .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2003, 112 (02) :135-189
[5]   2 DISTINCTIONS IN GOODNESS [J].
KORSGAARD, CM .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1983, 92 (02) :169-195
[6]   Objective and Unconditioned Value [J].
Langton, Rae .
PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2007, 116 (02) :157-185
[7]  
Moore G. E., 2005, PRINCIPA ETHICA
[8]  
Pettit P., 2013, LECT GIVEN ANU RES S
[9]  
Pettit P., 2011, LECT GIVEN PART 2011
[10]   A QUESTION FOR TOMORROW: THE ROBUST DEMANDS OF THE GOOD [J].
Pettit, Philip .
ATELIERS DE L ETHIQUE-THE ETHICS FORUM, 2012, 7 (03) :7-12