From the field: Efficacy of detecting chronic wasting disease via sampling hunter-killed white-tailed deer

被引:0
作者
Diefenbach, DB [1 ]
Rosenberry, CS
Boyd, RC
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, US Geol Survey, Cooperat Fish & Wildlife Res Unit, Merkle Lab 113, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn Game Commiss, Harrisburg, PA 17110 USA
关键词
Chronic Wasting Disease; Odocoileus virginianus; Pennsylvania; prevalence; probability of detection; sample size; sampling design; white-tailed deer;
D O I
10.2193/0091-7648(2004)32[267:FTFEOD]2.0.CO;2
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
dSurveillance programs for Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) in free-ranging cervids often use a standard of being able to detect 1% prevalence when determining minimum sample sizes. However, 11% prevalence may represent >10,000 infected animals in a population of I million, and most wildlife managers would prefer to detect the presence of CWD when far fewer infected animals exist. We wanted to detect the presence of CWD in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in Pennsylvania when the disease was present in only 1 of 21 wildlife management units (WMUs) statewide. We used computer simulation to estimate the probability of detecting CWD based on a sampling design to detect the presence of CWD at 0.1% and 1.0% prevalence (23-76 and 225-762 infected deer, respectively) using tissue samples collected from hunter-killed deer. The probability of detection at 0.1% prevalence was <30% with sample sizes of less than or equal to6,000 deer, and the probability of detection at 1.0% prevalence was 46-72% with statewide sample sizes of 2,000-6,000 deer. We believe that testing of hunter-killed deer is an essential part of any surveillance program for CWD, but our results demonstrated the importance of a multifaceted surveillance approach for CWD detection rather than sole reliance on testing hunter-killed deer.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 272
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Bartelt G.A., 2003, ENV IMPACT STATEMENT
[2]   Detection of bias in harvest-based estimates of chronic wasting disease prevalence in mule deer [J].
Conner, MM ;
McCarty, CW ;
Miller, MW .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2000, 36 (04) :691-699
[3]   Epizootiology of chronic wasting disease in free-ranging cervids in Colorado and Wyoming [J].
Miller, MW ;
Williams, ES ;
McCarty, CW ;
Spraker, TR ;
Kreeger, TJ ;
Larsen, CT ;
Thorne, ET .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES, 2000, 36 (04) :676-690
[4]  
Roseberry J. L., 1991, WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS, V117
[5]  
Samuel M.D., 2003, Surveillance strategies for detecting chronic wasting disease in free-ranging deer and elk: Results of a CWD surveillance workshop
[6]  
*US DEP INT FISH W, 2002, 2001 NAT SURV FISH H
[7]   Chronic wasting disease of deer and elk: A review with recommendations for management [J].
Williams, ES ;
Miller, MW ;
Kreeger, TJ ;
Kahn, RH ;
Thorne, ET .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 66 (03) :551-563
[8]   Evaluation of antemortem sampling to estimate chronic wasting disease prevalence in free-ranging mule deer [J].
Wolfe, LL ;
Conner, MM ;
Baker, TH ;
Dreitz, VJ ;
Burnham, KP ;
Williams, ES ;
Hobbs, NT ;
Miller, MW .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 66 (03) :564-573