Make friends, not money: How Chinese enterprises select transport infrastructure investment locations along the Belt and Road

被引:11
作者
Chen, Yang [1 ]
Chao, Yiying [1 ]
Liu, Wei [2 ]
Tao, Kan [1 ]
Lian, Peng [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Kings Coll London, London, England
[3] East China Univ Polit Sci & Law, Int Sch Law & Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Belt and road initiative; Transport infrastructure investment; Location choice; Institutional theory; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; INSTITUTIONAL DISTANCE; OUTWARD FDI; DETERMINANTS; STRATEGIES; NETWORKS; POLITICS; ENTRIES; CHOICE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since the 2013 launch of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), which has long been recognized as one of the most complex international cooperation activities, a large proportion of the 90 billion in Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in the regions constituting the BRI, has flowed into the transport infrastructure sector. Chinese enterprises select transport infrastructure locations as an effective way to mitigate the uncertainties associated with institutional voids in host countries that undermine the functioning of market institutions and expose investors to additional risks. Theoretically, drawing on institutional theory, we propose that bilateral diplomatic activities between host countries and China can serve as an effective risk-reduction mechanism, while institutional distance and common land borders have significant moderating effects on this process. Empirically, based on a unique set of data manually collected from the official website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China, our Poisson count regression and negative binomial regression analysis results generally confirm our hypotheses. Implications for both researchers and practitioners are discussed at the end of the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 132
页数:14
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   FDI from the south: The role of institutional distance and natural resources [J].
Aleksynska, Mariya ;
Havrylchyk, Olena .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2013, 29 :38-53
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, FRAGILE STATES INDEX
[3]   Foreign direct investment in Africa: The role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability [J].
Asiedu, E .
WORLD ECONOMY, 2006, 29 (01) :63-77
[4]   Geographic factors and China's regional development under market reforms, 1978-1998 [J].
Bao, SM ;
Chang, GH ;
Sachs, JD ;
Woo, WT .
CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 13 (01) :89-111
[5]  
Blonigen Bruce A., 2004, NBER Working Paper No. 10378
[6]   Has distance died?: Evidence from a panel gravity model [J].
Brun, JF ;
Carrère, C ;
Guillaumont, P ;
de Melo, J .
WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 19 (01) :99-120
[7]   The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment [J].
Buckley, Peter J. ;
Clegg, L. Jeremy ;
Cross, Adam R. ;
Liu, Xin ;
Voss, Hinrich ;
Zheng, Ping .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2007, 38 (04) :499-518
[8]   REGRESSION-BASED TESTS FOR OVERDISPERSION IN THE POISSON MODEL [J].
CAMERON, AC ;
TRIVEDI, PK .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (03) :347-364
[9]  
Cameron AC, 2005, Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511811241
[10]  
Cameron C., 2013, Regression Analysis of Count Data