The economic implications of multiple pregnancy following ART

被引:39
作者
Chambers, Georgina M. [1 ]
Ledger, William [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol & Stat Unit, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Royal Hosp Women, Sch Womens & Childrens Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Assisted reproductive technology; Cost analysis; Health economics; Health policy; Multiple births; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; SINGLE-EMBRYO-TRANSFER; LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT; GEOGRAPHICALLY DETERMINED POPULATION; HOSPITAL-CARE UTILIZATION; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; AGE; 8-9; YEARS; PRETERM BIRTH; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; ELECTIVE SINGLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.siny.2014.04.004
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The clinical risks to mothers and babies associated with assisted reproductive technology (ART) multiple birth pregnancies are well described and widely recognized. In contrast, the long-term economic consequences that follow are less appreciated. The few economic analyses that do exist consistently demonstrate the greater patient, healthcare and societal costs associated with twins and higher-order multiples when compared with singleton infants, and convincingly add to the argument that single embryo transfer should be standard practice in most patient groups. Several recent studies have shown that the relative price paid by patients for ART treatment not only has implications for who can afford to access treatment, but also plays an important role in incentivizing embryo transfer practices and thus ART multiple birth rates. This review summarizes the current literature on the costs and consequences of ART multiple births, the contribution of ART multiple births to the economic burden associated with preterm birth, the evidence for the cost-effectiveness of single embryo transfer, and the association between the cost of treatment and the downstream costs associated with multiple births. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:254 / 261
页数:8
相关论文
共 83 条
[41]  
International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART), 2013, PREL GLOB ART DAT 20
[42]   Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization [J].
Jain, T ;
Harlow, BL ;
Hornstein, MD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (09) :661-666
[43]   Health care costs resulting from IVF:: prenatal and neonatal periods [J].
Koivurova, S ;
Hartikainen, AL ;
Gissler, M ;
Hemminki, E ;
Klemetti, R ;
Järvelin, MR .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (12) :2798-2805
[44]   Fertility Treatments and Multiple Births in the United States [J].
Kulkarni, Aniket D. ;
Jamieson, Denise J. ;
Jones, Howard W., Jr. ;
Kissin, Dmitry M. ;
Gallo, Maria F. ;
Macaluso, Maurizio ;
Adashi, Eli Y. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2013, 369 (23) :2218-2225
[45]   Effect of the new legislation and single-embryo transfer policy in Turkey on assisted reproduction outcomes: preliminary results [J].
Kutlu, P. ;
Atvar, O. ;
Vanlioglu, O. F. ;
Kutlu, U. ;
Arici, A. ;
Yilmaz, S. ;
Yilmaz, E. ;
Delikara, N. ;
Bener, F. ;
Kamar, A. ;
Alpak, O. ;
Ozekici, U. .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2011, 22 (02) :208-214
[46]   The costs to the of multiple births after IVF treatment in the UK. [J].
Ledger, WL ;
Anumba, D ;
Marlow, N ;
Thomas, CM ;
Wilson, ECF .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 113 (01) :21-25
[47]   Healthcare expenses associated with multiple vs singleton pregnancies in the United States [J].
Lemos, Elkin V. ;
Zhang, Dongmu ;
Van Voorhis, Bradley J. ;
Hu, X. Henry .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2013, 209 (06) :586.e1-586.e11
[48]   Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Lukassen, HGM ;
Braat, DD ;
Wetzels, AMM ;
Zielhuis, GA ;
Adang, EMM ;
Scheenjes, E ;
Kremer, JAM .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (03) :702-708
[49]   Cost analysis of singleton versus twin pregnancies after in vitro fertilization [J].
Lukassen, HGM ;
Schönbeck, Y ;
Adang, EMM ;
Braat, DDM ;
Zielhuis, GA ;
Kremer, JAM .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (05) :1240-1246
[50]   Why is it important to diagnose chorionicity and how do we do it? [J].
Machin, GA .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2004, 18 (04) :515-530