DNA barcode divergence among species and genera of birds and fishes

被引:315
作者
Ward, Robert D. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, CSIRO Wealth Oceans Flagship, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
关键词
cox1; cryptic species; cytochrome c oxidase; species identification; FRESH-WATER FISHES; EVOLUTION; RATES; NUCLEOTIDE; SEQUENCES; SHARKS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02541.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
COI DNA barcoding is increasingly recognized as a significant new tool for the recognition and identification of animal species. Here, publicly available barcode data are compiled and analysed for birds (657 species) and fishes (1088 species). The proportion of species that cannot be barcode-distinguished by this marker is approximately 6.4% for birds and 2.1-2.5% for fishes. At all hierarchical taxonomic levels (species, genera, family, order, class), fish show greater mean COI divergence than birds. If two samples are barcode-identical, then for both birds and fishes, the probability that they are from the same species is 98-99%. The probability of conspecificity rapidly drops as divergence increases. At 2% COI divergence, this probability approximates to 1% for birds and 3% for fishes. The apparent difference between birds and fishes might partially reflect currently unrecognized cryptic species complexes in the latter. These probability estimates derive from pooled samples of birds and pooled samples of fishes, and will not apply in all situations. Recently evolved species complexes will have higher proportions of species that are barcode-identical. As barcode data accumulate, more refined statistical analyses will become possible.
引用
收藏
页码:1077 / 1085
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   EVOLUTIONARY ANALYSIS OF CYTOCHROME-B SEQUENCES IN SOME PERCIFORMES - EVIDENCE FOR A SLOWER RATE OF EVOLUTION THAN IN MAMMALS [J].
CANTATORE, P ;
ROBERTI, M ;
PESOLE, G ;
LUDOVICO, A ;
MILELLA, F ;
GADALETA, MN ;
SACCONE, C .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1994, 39 (06) :589-597
[2]   Identification of birds through DNA barcodes [J].
Hebert, PDN ;
Stoeckle, MY ;
Zemlak, TS ;
Francis, CM .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (10) :1657-1663
[3]   Barcoding animal life:: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species [J].
Hebert, PDN ;
Ratnasingham, S ;
deWaard, JR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 :S96-S99
[4]   DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space [J].
Hickerson, Michael J. ;
Meyer, Christopher P. ;
Moritz, Craig .
SYSTEMATIC BIOLOGY, 2006, 55 (05) :729-739
[5]   Identifying Canadian Freshwater Fishes through DNA Barcodes [J].
Hubert, Nicolas ;
Hanner, Robert ;
Holm, Erling ;
Mandrak, Nicholas E. ;
Taylor, Eric ;
Burridge, Mary ;
Watkinson, Douglas ;
Dumont, Pierre ;
Curry, Allen ;
Bentzen, Paul ;
Zhang, Junbin ;
April, Julien ;
Bernatchez, Louis .
PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (06)
[6]   An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA [J].
Ivanova, Natalia V. ;
Dewaard, Jeremy R. ;
Hebert, Paul D. N. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2006, 6 (04) :998-1002
[7]   DNA barcoding using chitons (genus Mopalia) [J].
Kelly, Ryan P. ;
Sarkar, Indra Neil ;
Eernisse, Douglas J. ;
Desalle, Rob .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY NOTES, 2007, 7 (02) :177-183
[8]  
Kerr Kevin C R, 2007, Mol Ecol Notes, V7, P535
[10]   Evidence for a slowed rate of molecular evolution in the order Acipenseriformes [J].
Krieger, J ;
Fuerst, PA .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2002, 19 (06) :891-897