Predictors of smoke-free workplaces by employee characteristics: Who is left unprotected?

被引:13
作者
Delnevo, CD [1 ]
Hrywna, M [1 ]
Lewis, MJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Educ & Behav Sci, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
关键词
adults; workplace; tobacco; environmental tobacco smoke; policies;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.20041
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Over the last decade, there has been steady progress in the adoption of workplace smoking policies in the United States. However, the benefits of a smoke-free workplace are not distributed equally among the workforce. Methods Data from 44,357 adults who reported that they work indoors were derived from an optional tobacco module on the 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), administered by 25 states. Logistic regression was utilized to examine factors associated with the absence of a smoke-free workplace policy. Results Overall, 70.9% of respondents reported working under a smoke-free workplace policy. The likelihood of being protected by a smoke-free workplace policy was significantly lower among workers who were younger, male, non-white, engaged in heavy labor earned less than $50,000 annually, had a high school education or less, smoked everyday, or worked in the South or Midwest. Conclusions There remain considerable gaps in smoke-free workplace policy coverage. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, RESP HLTH EFF PASS S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, MMWR MORB MORT WKLY, V51, P300
[3]   THE EFFECTS OF BEHAVIORAL RISKS ON ABSENTEEISM AND HEALTH-CARE COSTS IN THE WORKPLACE [J].
BERTERA, RL .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1991, 33 (11) :1119-1124
[4]  
*CDC, 1988, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V37, P239
[5]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2003, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V52, P842
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2000, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V49, P978
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2002, BEH RISK FACT SURV S
[8]   Environmental tobacco smoke and lung function in employees who never smoked: the Scottish MONICA study [J].
Chen, R ;
Tunstall-Pedoe, H ;
Tavendale, R .
OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (09) :563-568
[9]  
Department of Health and Human Services (USA), 2000, HLTH PEOPL 2010 UND
[10]   The effects of household and workplace smoking restrictions on quitting behaviours [J].
Farkas, AJ ;
Gilpin, EA ;
Distefan, JM ;
Pierce, JP .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 1999, 8 (03) :261-265