Temporality in epistemic justice

被引:10
作者
Valkenburg, Govert [1 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Dept Interdisciplinary Studies Culture KULT, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
Epistemic justice; time; knowledge; temporality; epistemic agency; POST-TRUTH; KNOWLEDGE; PARTICIPATION; ANTHROPOCENE; POLITICS; TIME; STS;
D O I
10.1177/0961463X221094699
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Democracy requires some sort of exchange of knowledge between holders of different knowledge positions. The concept of epistemic justice brings the ability to know and the right to be recognised as a knowledgeable person under a scheme of justice. It problematises social conditions that potentially compromise the ability to share knowledge and thereby effectuate change and the possibility of being recognised as a knowing subject and being granted access to equitable means of producing knowledge. This paper engages with temporal aspects of epistemic justice. What role do temporalities play in people's possibilities to create knowledge and the way they create knowledge? What role does time play in the valuation and circulation of knowledges? How do hegemonic conceptions of time potentially make some knowledges circulate more freely than others? Since conceptions of time connect to specific forms of knowledge, hierarchies and speakabilities of temporalities form an immediate correlate of hierarchies of knowledge. By extension, such hierarchies feed into schemes of epistemic justice. Thus, democracy's duty to emancipate suppressed voices requires emancipating the times from which those suppressed voices speak.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 454
页数:18
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Reflexive modernization temporalized [J].
Adam, B .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2003, 20 (02) :59-+
[2]  
Adam B., 1995, TIMEWATCH SOCIAL ANA
[3]  
Adam Barbara., 2004, Time
[4]   Politics of prediction: Security and the time/space of governmentality in the age of big data [J].
Aradau, Claudia ;
Blanke, Tobias .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL THEORY, 2017, 20 (03) :373-391
[5]   Inevitability, contingency, and the epistemic significance of time [J].
Benda, Libor .
TIME & SOCIETY, 2021, 30 (01) :30-54
[6]   Conceptualising flexibility: Challenging representations of time and society in the energy sector* [J].
Blue, Stanley ;
Shove, Elizabeth ;
Forman, Peter .
TIME & SOCIETY, 2020, 29 (04) :923-944
[8]   Domination, Epistemic Injustice and Republican Epistemology [J].
Bohman, James .
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY, 2012, 26 (02) :175-187
[9]  
Briggle A, 2021, THINKING CLIMATE CHA
[10]   On time, space, and action nets [J].
Czarniawska, B .
ORGANIZATION, 2004, 11 (06) :773-791