Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect

被引:284
|
作者
Stanley, Scott M. [1 ]
Rhoades, Galena Kline [1 ]
Markman, Howard J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Denver, Dept Psychol, Ctr Marital & Family Studies, Denver, CO 80208 USA
关键词
cohabitation; commitment; divorce; marriage; relationships;
D O I
10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Premarital cohabitation has consistently been found to be associated with increased risk for divorce and marital distress in the United States. Two explanations for this "cohabitation effect" are discussed: selection and experience. We present an empirically based view of how the experience of cohabitation may increase risk for relationship distress or divorce for some people beyond what is accounted for by selection. Specifically, using a commitment framework, we suggest that some couples who otherwise would not have married end up married because of the inertia of cohabitation. We discuss practice implications for relationship transitions that are characterized more by sliding than deciding, especially where a transition such as cohabitation increases inertia to remain in a relationship regardless of quality or fit.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 509
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Racial and ethnic differences in the role of cohabitation in premarital childbearing
    Manning, WD
    Landale, NS
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1996, 58 (01): : 63 - 77
  • [32] Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American women
    Phillips, JA
    Sweeney, MM
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2005, 67 (02) : 296 - 314
  • [33] Sliding Versus Deciding in Relationships: Associations With Relationship Quality, Commitment, and Infidelity
    Owen, Jesse
    Rhoades, Galena K.
    Stanley, Scott M.
    JOURNAL OF COUPLE & RELATIONSHIP THERAPY-INNOVATIONS IN CLINICAL AND EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS, 2013, 12 (02): : 135 - 149
  • [34] Does premarital cohabitation increase the likelihood of future marital dissolution?
    Sarah Kerrigan
    James Bailey
    SN Social Sciences, 1 (5):
  • [35] Premarital cohabitation and housework: Couples in cross-national perspective
    Batalova, JA
    Cohen, PN
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2002, 64 (03) : 743 - 755
  • [36] Generating New Stories of Commitment in Couple Relationships by Utilizing the Sliding Versus Deciding Framework
    Sibley, D. Scott
    Kimmes, Jonathan G.
    Schmidt, Alexandra E.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2015, 26 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [37] Cohabitation versus marriage: A comparison of relationship quality
    Brown, SL
    Booth, A
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1996, 58 (03): : 668 - 678
  • [38] Wage Premium and Wage Penalty in Marriage versus Cohabitation
    Bonnet, Carole
    Jeandidier, Bruno
    Solaz, Anne
    REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE, 2018, 128 (05): : 745 - 775
  • [39] Cohabitation and premarital sex amongst Christian youth in South Africa today: A missional reflection
    Mashau, Thinandavha D.
    HTS TEOLOGIESE STUDIES-THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2011, 67 (02):
  • [40] The Pre-Engagement Cohabitation Effect: A Replication and Extension of Previous Findings
    Rhoades, Galena K.
    Stanley, Scott M.
    Markman, Howard J.
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) : 107 - 111