CONCEPTS OF THE CONSUMER IN COMPETITION, REGULATORY, AND CONSUMER PROTECTION POLICES

被引:11
作者
Decker, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Law & Econ, CSLS, Oxford, England
关键词
BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; INDUSTRIAL-ORGANIZATION; OVERCONFIDENT CONSUMERS; ANTITRUST POLICY; DECISION-MAKING; ULTIMATUM GAME; SELF-CONTROL; BILL-SHOCK; PSYCHOLOGY; PREFERENCE;
D O I
10.1093/joclec/nhx005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Competition and economic regulation policies have traditionally been based on the conception of a "standard" consumer who is perfectly rational, has a high level of computational skills, and is invariant to the environment in which choices are made. An ever-expanding body of research concludes that, for a variety of reasons, consumers often behave in various "non-standard" ways. In light of this research, some economic regulators and competition authorities are replacing the concept of the standard consumer with the concept of the non-standard consumer. This is justified on the basis that it is more realistic and offers the potential for more effective policies anchored in the behavior of actual consumers. While there are persuasive arguments for adopting a concept of the non-standard consumer, effectively integrating non-standard consumers into relevant policies raises conceptual challenges and risks, some of which have been borne out in practice. In particular, attention needs to be given to: the specific nature of the nonstandard consumer behavior; the relative proportion of consumers characterized by non-standard behavior; possible supplier responses to remedial measures; and critically, the potential unintended effects of such policies. If these parameters and challenges are acknowledged and effectively incorporated into analytical frameworks, the potential exists for better-targeted competition and regulatory policies.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 184
页数:34
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [71] Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting
    Laibson, D
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1997, 112 (02) : 443 - 477
  • [72] Littlechild S., 2015, EUR COMPET J, V11, P574, DOI [10.1080/17441056.2016.1153311, DOI 10.1080/17441056.2016.1153311]
  • [73] SOME ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES TO UTILITY REGULATION
    Littlechild, Stephen
    [J]. ECONOMIC AFFAIRS, 2008, 28 (03) : 32 - 37
  • [74] Lourenco JS., 2016, BEHAV INSIGHTS APPL
  • [75] Lunn P., 2014, Regulatory policy and behavioural economics
  • [76] Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks
    McClure, SM
    Li, J
    Tomlin, D
    Cypert, KS
    Montague, LM
    Montague, PR
    [J]. NEURON, 2004, 44 (02) : 379 - 387
  • [77] Mena-Labarthe Carlos, 2016, CPI ANTITRUST CHRON, P1
  • [78] Mimica Neven, 2013, EUROPEAN COMMR CONSU
  • [79] National Audit Office, 2017, VULN CONS REG IND
  • [80] OFFICE OF FAIR TRADING, 2012, MARK STUD EXT WARR D