18F-FDG PET/CT Quantitative Parameters and Texture Analysis Effectively Differentiate Endometrial Precancerous Lesion and Early-Stage Carcinoma

被引:17
作者
Wang, Tong [1 ]
Sun, Hongzan [1 ]
Guo, Yan [2 ]
Zou, Lue [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sanhao St 36, Shenyang, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] GE Healthcare, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
PET; CT; endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH); endometrial carcinoma (EC 1a); SUVpeak; SUVmax; textural analysis; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; METABOLIC TUMOR VOLUME; CANCER; HETEROGENEITY; FEATURES; HYPERPLASIA; MARKERS; PREDICT; BENIGN; SUVMAX;
D O I
10.1177/1536012119856965
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Objective: This study evaluated the metabolic parameters and texture features of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) for the diagnosis and differentiation of endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH), EAH with field cancerization (FC), and stage 1A endometrial carcinoma (EC 1a). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the metabolic parameters of PET/CT in 170 patients with diagnoses confirmed by pathology, including 57 cases of EAH (57/170, 33.53%), 45 cases of FC (45/170, 26.47%), and 68 cases of EC 1a (68/170, 40.0%). Then, the texture features of each tumor were extracted and compared with the metabolic parameters and pathological results using nonparametric tests and linear regression analysis. The diagnostic performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) values obtained from receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: There were moderate positive correlations between the PET standardized uptake values (SUVpeak, SUVmax, and SUVmean) and postoperative pathological features with correlation coefficients (r(s)) of 0.663, 0.651, and 0.651, respectively (P < .001). Total lesion glycolysis showed relatively low correlation with pathological characteristics (r(s) = 0.476), whereas metabolic tumor volume and age showed the weakest correlations (r(s) = 0.186 and 0.232, respectively). To differentiate between the diagnosis of EAH and FC, SUVmax displayed the largest AUC of 0.857 (sensitivity, 82.2%; specificity, 84.2%). Five texture features were screened out as Percentile 40, Percentile 45, InverseDifferenceMoment_AllDirection_offset 1, InverseDifferenceMoment_angle 45_offset 4, and ClusterProminence_angle 135_offset 7 (P < .001) by linear model of texture analysis (AUC = 0.851; specificity = 0.692; sensitivity = 0.871). To differentiate between the diagnoses of FC and EC 1a, SUVpeak displayed the largest AUC of 0.715 (sensitivity, 67.6%; specificity, 77.8%), and 2 texture features were identified as Percentile 10 and CP_angle 135_offset 7 (AUC = 0.819; specificity = 0.871; sensitivity = 0.766; P < .001). Conclusions: SUVmax and SUVpeak had the highest diagnostic values for EAH, FC, and EC 1a compared with the other tested parameters. SUVmax, Percentile 40, Percentile 45, InverseDifferenceMoment_AllDirection_offset 1, InverseDifferenceMoment_angle 45_offset 4, and ClusterProminence_angle 135_offset 7 distinguished EAH from FC. SUVpeak, Percentile 10, and ClusterProminence_angle 135_offset 7 distinguished FC from EC 1a. This study showed that the addition of texture features provides valuable information for differentiating EAH, FC, and EC 1a diagnoses.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Influence of Statistical Fluctuation on Reproducibility and Accuracy of SUVmax and SUVpeak: A Phantom Study
    Akamatsu, Go
    Ikari, Yasuhiko
    Nishida, Hiroyuki
    Nishio, Tomoyuki
    Ohnishi, Akihito
    Maebatake, Akira
    Sasaki, Masayuki
    Senda, Michio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 43 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [2] SUVmax of 18FDG PET/CT as a predictor of high-risk endometrial cancer patients
    Antonsen, Sofie Leisby
    Loft, Annika
    Fisker, Rune
    Nielsen, Anne Lerberg
    Andersen, Erik Sogaard
    Hogdall, Estrid
    Tabor, Ann
    Jochumsen, Kirsten
    Fago-Olsen, Carsten L.
    Asmussen, Jon
    Berthelsen, Anne Kiil
    Christensen, Ib Jarle
    Hogdall, Claus
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 129 (02) : 298 - 303
  • [3] Imaging genomics in cancer research: limitations and promises
    Bai, Harrison X.
    Lee, Ashley M.
    Yang, Li
    Zhang, Paul
    Davatzikos, Christos
    Maris, John M.
    Diskin, Sharon J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 89 (1061)
  • [4] Theragnostic imaging for radiation oncology: dose-painting by numbers
    Bentzen, SM
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (02) : 112 - 117
  • [5] Berg A, 2017, ONCOTARGET, V8, P68530, DOI 10.18632/oncotarget.19708
  • [6] Texture analysis of medical images
    Castellano, G
    Bonilha, L
    Li, LM
    Cendes, F
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 59 (12) : 1061 - 1069
  • [7] Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis
    Chicklore, Sugama
    Goh, Vicky
    Siddique, Musib
    Roy, Arunabha
    Marsden, Paul K.
    Cook, Gary J. R.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2013, 40 (01) : 133 - 140
  • [8] TEXTURAL FEATURES FOR IMAGE CLASSIFICATION
    HARALICK, RM
    SHANMUGAM, K
    DINSTEIN, I
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS, 1973, SMC3 (06): : 610 - 621
  • [9] Characterization of PET/CT images using texture analysis: the past, the presenta... any future?
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Tixier, Florent
    Pierce, Larry
    Kinahan, Paul E.
    Le Rest, Catherine Cheze
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2017, 44 (01) : 151 - 165
  • [10] 18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi-Cancer Site Patient Cohort
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Majdoub, Mohamed
    Vallieres, Martin
    Tixier, Florent
    Le Rest, Catherine Cheze
    Groheux, David
    Hindie, Elif
    Martineau, Antoine
    Pradier, Olivier
    Hustinx, Roland
    Perdrisot, Remy
    Guillevin, Remy
    El Naqa, Issam
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (01) : 38 - 44