Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:9
作者
Ma, Yang-Yang [1 ]
Leng, Yin [2 ]
Xing, Yan-Li [2 ]
Li, Hong-Mei [2 ]
Chen, Ji-Bing [1 ]
Niu, Li-Zhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Fuda Canc Hosp, Cent Lab, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Fuda Canc Hosp, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Fuda Canc Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 2 Tangde West Rd, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Irreversible electroporation; Gemcitabine; Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; Overall survival; Progression free survival; Prognostic factors; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; ABLATION; SAFETY; ADENOCARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE. AIM To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC. METHODS From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS. CONCLUSION Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC.
引用
收藏
页码:5564 / 5575
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Comparison of Survival Between Irreversible Electroporation Followed by Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J].
He, Chaobin ;
Huang, Xin ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Cai, Zhiyuan ;
Lin, Xiaojun ;
Li, Shengping .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
[2]   Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Kwon, Wooil ;
Thomas, Alexander ;
Kluger, Michael D. .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 48 (01) :84-94
[3]   Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J].
He, Chaobin ;
Sun, Shuxin ;
Zhang, Yu ;
Li, Shengping .
JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 2021, 14 :4795-4807
[4]   Gemcitabine-based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Wang, Bu-Hai ;
Cao, Wen-Miao ;
Yu, Jie ;
Wang, Xiao-Lei .
ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (05) :2129-2132
[5]   Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Timmer, Florentine E. F. ;
Geboers, Bart ;
Ruarus, Alette H. ;
Schouten, Evelien A. C. ;
Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne ;
Puijk, Robbert S. ;
de Vries, Jan J. J. ;
Meijerink, Martijn R. ;
Scheffer, Hester J. .
TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 23 (02)
[6]   Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Mustafa Cengiz ;
Faruk Zorlu ;
Suayip Yalcin ;
Murat Gurkaynak ;
I. Lale Atahan ;
Ibrahim H. Gullu .
Medical Oncology, 2007, 24 :239-243
[7]   Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
Cengiz, Mustafa ;
Zorlu, Faruk ;
Yalcin, Suayip ;
Gurkaynak, Murat ;
Atahan, I. Lale ;
Gullu, Ibrahim H. .
MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 24 (02) :239-243
[8]   Induction Gemcitabine Plus Concurrent Gemcitabine and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Resected Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Youl, M. ;
Hashem, S. ;
Brade, A. ;
Cummings, B. ;
Dawson, L. A. ;
Gallinger, S. ;
Hedley, D. ;
Jiang, H. ;
Kim, J. ;
Krzyzanowska, M. K. ;
Ringash, J. ;
Wong, R. ;
Brierley, J. .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) :203-209
[9]   The Synergistic Role of Irreversible Electroporation and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer [J].
Gyftopoulos, Argyrios ;
Ziogas, Ioannis A. ;
Barbas, Andrew S. ;
Moris, Dimitrios .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[10]   Comparison of gemcitabine plus platinum analog with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer [J].
O'Reilly, E. M. ;
Abou-Alfa, G. K. .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 5 (06) :312-313