Gemcitabine plus concurrent irreversible electroporation vs gemcitabine alone for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

被引:9
|
作者
Ma, Yang-Yang [1 ]
Leng, Yin [2 ]
Xing, Yan-Li [2 ]
Li, Hong-Mei [2 ]
Chen, Ji-Bing [1 ]
Niu, Li-Zhi [3 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Fuda Canc Hosp, Cent Lab, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Fuda Canc Hosp, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Affiliated Fuda Canc Hosp, Dept Intervent Radiol, 2 Tangde West Rd, Guangzhou 510665, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Irreversible electroporation; Gemcitabine; Locally advanced pancreatic cancer; Overall survival; Progression free survival; Prognostic factors; INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY; ABLATION; SAFETY; ADENOCARCINOMA; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.12998/wjcc.v8.i22.5564
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is a common malignant digestive system tumor that ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. The prognosis of LAPC is poor even after standard treatment. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative strategy for LAPC. Several studies have confirmed the safety of IRE. To date, no prospective studies have been performed to investigate the therapeutic efficacy of conventional gemcitabine (GEM) plus concurrent IRE. AIM To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conventional GEM plus concurrent IRE and GEM alone for LAPC. METHODS From February 2016 to September 2017, a total of 68 LAPC patients were treated with GEM plus concurrent IRE n = 33) or GEM alone n = 35). Overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify any prognostic factors. RESULTS There were no treatment-related deaths. The technical success rate of IRE ablation was 100%. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer OS from the time of diagnosis of LAPC (19.8 mo vs 9.3 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. The GEM + IRE group had a significantly longer PFS (8.3 mo vs 4.7 mo, P < 0.0001) than the GEM alone group. Tumor volume less than 37 cm(3) and GEM plus concurrent IRE were identified as significant favorable factors for both the OS and PFS. CONCLUSION Gemcitabine plus concurrent IRE is an effective treatment for patients with LAPC.
引用
收藏
页码:5564 / 5575
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Survival Between Irreversible Electroporation Followed by Chemotherapy and Chemotherapy Alone for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    He, Chaobin
    Huang, Xin
    Zhang, Yu
    Cai, Zhiyuan
    Lin, Xiaojun
    Li, Shengping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [2] Irreversible electroporation of locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kwon, Wooil
    Thomas, Alexander
    Kluger, Michael D.
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 48 (01) : 84 - 94
  • [3] Irreversible Electroporation Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody versus Irreversible Electroporation Alone for Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    He, Chaobin
    Sun, Shuxin
    Zhang, Yu
    Li, Shengping
    JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 4795 - 4807
  • [4] Gemcitabine-based Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Patients with Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Wang, Bu-Hai
    Cao, Wen-Miao
    Yu, Jie
    Wang, Xiao-Lei
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2012, 13 (05) : 2129 - 2132
  • [5] Irreversible Electroporation for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Timmer, Florentine E. F.
    Geboers, Bart
    Ruarus, Alette H.
    Schouten, Evelien A. C.
    Nieuwenhuizen, Sanne
    Puijk, Robbert S.
    de Vries, Jan J. J.
    Meijerink, Martijn R.
    Scheffer, Hester J.
    TECHNIQUES IN VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 23 (02)
  • [6] Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Mustafa Cengiz
    Faruk Zorlu
    Suayip Yalcin
    Murat Gurkaynak
    I. Lale Atahan
    Ibrahim H. Gullu
    Medical Oncology, 2007, 24 : 239 - 243
  • [7] Concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Cengiz, Mustafa
    Zorlu, Faruk
    Yalcin, Suayip
    Gurkaynak, Murat
    Atahan, I. Lale
    Gullu, Ibrahim H.
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2007, 24 (02) : 239 - 243
  • [8] The Synergistic Role of Irreversible Electroporation and Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Gyftopoulos, Argyrios
    Ziogas, Ioannis A.
    Barbas, Andrew S.
    Moris, Dimitrios
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [9] Induction Gemcitabine Plus Concurrent Gemcitabine and Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Unresectable or Resected Pancreatic Cancer
    Youl, M.
    Hashem, S.
    Brade, A.
    Cummings, B.
    Dawson, L. A.
    Gallinger, S.
    Hedley, D.
    Jiang, H.
    Kim, J.
    Krzyzanowska, M. K.
    Ringash, J.
    Wong, R.
    Brierley, J.
    CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 26 (04) : 203 - 209
  • [10] Comparison of gemcitabine plus platinum analog with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer
    O'Reilly, E. M.
    Abou-Alfa, G. K.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2008, 5 (06): : 312 - 313