Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services

被引:36
作者
Chen, Xiaodong [1 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Peterson, M. Nils [2 ]
Song, Conghe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Geog, Carolina Hall,Campus Box 3220, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol Program, Box 7646, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Complex human-environment interactions; Ecological Welfare Forest Program; Grain-to-Green Program; Human livelihoods; Stated choice; Tianma National Nature Reserve; CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; INCENTIVE PROGRAMS; NATIONAL-PARK; EFFICIENCY; PATTERNS; HABITAT; PARTICIPATION; WILDLIFE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-018-1105-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payments for ecosystem services (PES) may alter dynamics in coupled human and natural systems, producing reciprocal feedback effects on socioeconomic and environmental outcomes. As forests recover following China's two nation-wide PES programs, wildlife-related crop raiding has been increasingly affecting rural people's livelihoods. We evaluate the feedback effect of crop raiding on people's intention to convert their cropland plots into forests under different PES program scenarios in the Tianma National Nature Reserve. Increases in crop raiding, conservation payment amounts, and program duration significantly increased local people's intention to enroll their cropland plots in future PES programs. Our results suggest that a substantial portion of economic benefit from the current PES programs was offset by the feedback effect of crop raiding promoted by these programs. Therefore, such complex human-environment interactions should be incorporated into the design and evaluation of China's PES practices and other PES programs around the world.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 740
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Global patterns of collective payments for ecosystem services and their degrees of commodification
    Kaiser, Josef
    Krueger, Tobias
    Haase, Dagmar
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2023, 209
  • [32] The global status and trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services
    Salzman, James
    Bennett, Genevieve
    Carroll, Nathaniel
    Goldstein, Allie
    Jenkins, Michael
    NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 1 (03): : 136 - 144
  • [33] Payments for ecosystem services in developing world fisheries
    Bladon, Annabelle J.
    Short, Katherine M.
    Mohammed, Essam Yassin
    Milner-Gulland, E. J.
    FISH AND FISHERIES, 2016, 17 (03) : 839 - 859
  • [34] Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view
    Van Hecken, Gert
    Bastiaensen, Johan
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2010, 13 (08) : 785 - 792
  • [35] Payments for Ecosystem Services as Incentives for Collective Action
    Muradian, Roldan
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2013, 26 (10) : 1155 - 1169
  • [36] Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global
    Farley, Joshua
    Costanza, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (11) : 2060 - 2068
  • [37] Negotiating over payments for wetland ecosystem services
    Nimubona, Alain-Desire
    Pereau, Jean-Christophe
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2022, 55 (03): : 1507 - 1538
  • [38] Risk, reward, and payments for ecosystem services: A portfolio approach to ecosystem services and forestland investment
    Matthies, Brent D.
    Kalliokoski, Tuomo
    Ekholm, Tommi
    Hoen, Hans Fredrik
    Valsta, Lauri T.
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 16 : 1 - 12
  • [39] Payments for Ecosystem Services-the Case of Forests
    Prokofieva, Irina
    CURRENT FORESTRY REPORTS, 2016, 2 (02): : 130 - 142
  • [40] Asset-building payments for ecosystem services: assessing landowner perceptions of reforestation incentives in Lebanon
    Sarkissian, Arbi J.
    Brook, Robert M.
    Talhouk, Salma N.
    Hockley, Neal
    FOREST SYSTEMS, 2017, 26 (02)