Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services

被引:36
|
作者
Chen, Xiaodong [1 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Peterson, M. Nils [2 ]
Song, Conghe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Geog, Carolina Hall,Campus Box 3220, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Forestry & Environm Resources, Fisheries Wildlife & Conservat Biol Program, Box 7646, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Complex human-environment interactions; Ecological Welfare Forest Program; Grain-to-Green Program; Human livelihoods; Stated choice; Tianma National Nature Reserve; CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM; ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES; INCENTIVE PROGRAMS; NATIONAL-PARK; EFFICIENCY; PATTERNS; HABITAT; PARTICIPATION; WILDLIFE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s13280-018-1105-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Payments for ecosystem services (PES) may alter dynamics in coupled human and natural systems, producing reciprocal feedback effects on socioeconomic and environmental outcomes. As forests recover following China's two nation-wide PES programs, wildlife-related crop raiding has been increasingly affecting rural people's livelihoods. We evaluate the feedback effect of crop raiding on people's intention to convert their cropland plots into forests under different PES program scenarios in the Tianma National Nature Reserve. Increases in crop raiding, conservation payment amounts, and program duration significantly increased local people's intention to enroll their cropland plots in future PES programs. Our results suggest that a substantial portion of economic benefit from the current PES programs was offset by the feedback effect of crop raiding promoted by these programs. Therefore, such complex human-environment interactions should be incorporated into the design and evaluation of China's PES practices and other PES programs around the world.
引用
收藏
页码:732 / 740
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Payments and penalties in ecosystem services programs
    Kim, Youngho
    Lichtenberg, Erik
    Newburn, David A.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 126
  • [22] Scaling agroforestry through payments for ecosystem services: a scoping review
    Mayr, Sebastian
    Pokorny, Benno
    Montero-de-Oliveira, Fernando-Esteban
    Reinecke, Sabine
    CLIMATE POLICY, 2025,
  • [23] Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach
    Ureta, J. Carl
    Motallebi, Marzieh
    Vassalos, Michael
    Seagle, Steven
    Baldwin, Robert
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 201
  • [24] EFFICIENCY-EQUITY TRADEOFFS IN TARGETING PAYMENTS FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
    Wu, Junjie
    Yu, Jialing
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 99 (04) : 894 - 913
  • [25] Revealing pathways from payments for ecosystem services to socioeconomic outcomes
    Yang, Hongbo
    Yang, Wu
    Zhang, Jindong
    Connor, Thomas
    Liu, Jianguo
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2018, 4 (03):
  • [26] How to achieve fairness in payments for ecosystem services? Insights from agrobiodiversity conservation auctions
    Narloch, Ulf
    Pascual, Unai
    Drucker, Adam G.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2013, 35 : 107 - 118
  • [27] Beyond carbon: Conceptualizing payments for ecosystem services in blue forests on carbon and other marine and coastal ecosystem services
    Lau, Winnie W. Y.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 83 : 5 - 14
  • [28] Multiple-Purchaser Payments for Ecosystem Services: An Exploration Using Spatial Simulation Modelling
    Smith, Gregory
    Day, Brett
    Binner, Amy
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 74 (01) : 421 - 447
  • [29] Could Payments for Ecosystem Services Create an "Ecosystem Service Curse"?
    Kronenberg, Jakub
    Hubacek, Klaus
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [30] Agent-based modeling of the effects of social norms on enrollment in payments for ecosystem services
    Chen, Xiaodong
    Lupi, Frank
    An, Li
    Sheely, Ryan
    Vina, Andres
    Liu, Jianguo
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2012, 229 : 16 - 24