Deep-learning-based image quality enhancement of compressed sensing magnetic resonance imaging of vessel wall: comparison of self-supervised and unsupervised approaches

被引:33
作者
Eun, Da-In [1 ,2 ]
Jang, Ryoungwoo [1 ]
Ha, Woo Seok [1 ,3 ]
Lee, Hyunna [1 ]
Jung, Seung Chai [4 ,5 ]
Kim, Namkug [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Convergence Med, 88 Olympic Ro 43 Gil, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Sch Med, 26-6 Kyungheedae Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Yonsei Univ, Coll Med, Dept Neurol, 50 Yonsei Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, 88 Olympic Ro 43 Gil, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Res Inst Radiol, 88 Olympic Ro 43 Gil, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
RICIAN NOISE REMOVAL; MRI; RECONSTRUCTION; NETWORK; NORMALITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-020-69932-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
While high-resolution proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of intracranial vessel walls is significant for a precise diagnosis of intracranial artery disease, its long acquisition time is a clinical burden. Compressed sensing MRI is a prospective technology with acceleration factors that could potentially reduce the scan time. However, high acceleration factors result in degraded image quality. Although recent advances in deep-learning-based image restoration algorithms can alleviate this problem, clinical image pairs used in deep learning training typically do not align pixel-wise. Therefore, in this study, two different deep-learning-based denoising algorithms-self-supervised learning and unsupervised learning-are proposed; these algorithms are applicable to clinical datasets that are not aligned pixel-wise. The two approaches are compared quantitatively and qualitatively. Both methods produced promising results in terms of image denoising and visual grading. While the image noise and signal-to-noise ratio of self-supervised learning were superior to those of unsupervised learning, unsupervised learning was preferable over self-supervised learning in terms of radiomic feature reproducibility.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Aja-Fernandez S., 2013, A review on statistical noise models for magnetic resonance imaging
[2]   Noise estimation in parallel MRI: GRAPPA and SENSE [J].
Aja-Fernandez, Santiago ;
Vegas-Sanchez-Ferrero, Gonzalo ;
Tristan-Vega, Antonio .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2014, 32 (03) :281-290
[3]   High-resolution intracranial vessel wall imaging: imaging beyond the lumen [J].
Alexander, Matthew D. ;
Yuan, Chun ;
Rutman, Aaron ;
Tirschwell, David L. ;
Palagallo, Gerald ;
Gandhi, Dheeraj ;
Sekhar, Laligam N. ;
Mossa-Basha, Mahmud .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 87 (06) :589-597
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, ARXIV180606397
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, IEEE I CONF COMP VIS, DOI DOI 10.1109/ICCV.2017.244
[6]   Accelerated multi-contrast high isotropic resolution 3D intracranial vessel wall MRI using a tailored k-space undersampling and partially parallel reconstruction strategy [J].
Balu, Niranjan ;
Zhou, Zechen ;
Hippe, Daniel S. ;
Hatsukami, Thomas ;
Mossa-Basha, Mahmud ;
Yuan, Chun .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2019, 32 (03) :343-357
[7]  
Basu S, 2006, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V4190, P117
[8]  
Boas FE., 2012, IMAGING MED, V4, P229, DOI DOI 10.2217/IIM.12.13
[9]  
Chaudhari AS, 2020, J MAGN RESON IMAGING, V51, P768, DOI [10.1002/jmri.26991, 10.1002/jmri.26872]
[10]   Low-dose CT via convolutional neural network [J].
Chen, Hu ;
Zhang, Yi ;
Zhang, Weihua ;
Liao, Peixi ;
Li, Ke ;
Zhou, Jiliu ;
Wang, Ge .
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2017, 8 (02) :679-694