Using modified grounded theory for conducting systematic research study on sustainable project management field

被引:24
作者
Alnsour, Moawiah A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Isra Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Project Management & Sustainabil, Amman, Jordan
关键词
Sustainability; Project management; Modified grounded theory; Jordan;
D O I
10.1016/j.mex.2022.101897
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a method to conduct systematic research using modified grounded theory (MGT) in sustainable project management as an extended version of classical grounded theory. MGT allows for data collection from responders, followed by data analysis to generate findings into a set of categories. Recently, academic papers have revealed a lack of systematic approaches to conducting research in the sustainable project management field, an increasingly important area of study. The current research employs a method to investigate the sustainability practice in Jordan and the complexities and capabilities of sustainable project management. However, despite previous efforts within sustainable project management, researchers still seek consensus on the methodology for its consideration. Therefore, this study describes a novel step-by-step approach for conducting research to achieve this goal. Sustainable project management is challenging since it tends to be either qualitative or quantitative; hence, the identification of the appropriate research method is a hard task for a researcher. As a result, several research methods are often employed, and MGT is introduced as an effective approach. Indeed, since sustainable project management is an emerging field in Jordan, adopting a new research method should be considered over traditional approaches.center dot This paper introduces a new approach to investigating complexities and capabilities within sustainable project management.center dot The paper presents a brief description of the microanalysis of qualitative data.center dot The method establishes guidelines for generating theories from the ground up.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Project sustainability strategies: A systematic literature review [J].
Aarseth, Wenche ;
Ahola, Tuomas ;
Aaltonen, Kirsi ;
Okland, Andreas ;
Andersen, Bjorn .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (06) :1071-1083
[2]  
[Anonymous], UNDERSTANDING SOCIAL
[3]   Sustainable Project Management: A Conceptualization-Oriented Review and a Framework Proposal for Future Studies [J].
Armenia, Stefano ;
Dangelico, Rosa Maria ;
Nonino, Fabio ;
Pompei, Alessandro .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
[4]  
B. Stiftung The Sustainable Development Report, 2019, TRANSFORMATION ACHIE
[5]   Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries [J].
Banihashemi, Saeed ;
Hosseini, M. Reza ;
Golizadeh, Hamed ;
Sankaran, Shankar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2017, 35 (06) :1103-1119
[6]  
Bryman A.et E. Bell., 2003, BUSINESS RES METHODS
[7]  
Bulawa P., 2014, International Research in Education, V2, P145, DOI DOI 10.5296/IRE.V2I1.4921
[8]  
Charmaz, 2006, HDB EMERGENT METHODS
[9]   GROUNDED THEORY RESEARCH - PROCEDURES, CANONS AND EVALUATIVE CRITERIA [J].
CORBIN, J ;
STRAUSS, A .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIOLOGIE, 1990, 19 (06) :418-427
[10]  
Corbin J., 2007, BASICS QUALITATIVE R, V3rd, DOI DOI 10.4135/9781452230153