Stochastic Economic-Emission Dispatch with Confidence Interval Constraint

被引:0
作者
Lin, Z. J. [1 ]
Li, M. S. [1 ]
Ji, T. Y. [1 ]
Liu, L. [1 ]
Yang, X. Y. [2 ]
Li, Y. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Elect Power Engn, Guangzhou 510641, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] China Elect Power Res Inst, 15 Xiaoyingdong Rd, Beijing 100192, Peoples R China
来源
2019 IEEE PES GTD GRAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION ASIA (GTD ASIA) | 2019年
关键词
Bacterial swarm algorithm; Confidence interval constraint; Probability distribution function; Stochastic economic-emission dispatch; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; WIND POWER; PROBABILITY-DISTRIBUTIONS; INTEGRATION; ENERGY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/gtdasia.2019.8715979
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Aiming to reduce the fuel cost and pollution emission of power grid with high penetration of intermittent renewable energy, a novel stochastic dispatch scheme considering the economy and emission is proposed in this paper. Different from conventional stochastic dispatch that merely focuses on the minimization of the objectives on fuel cost and emission, the proposed method takes Confidence Interval (CI) constraint into consideration when selecting the optimal Probability Distribution Function (PDF) of fuel cost. The PDF with the narrowest CI width is demonstrated to have superior performance in terms of reliability. Moreover, with the advantage of fast convergence, bacterial swarm algorithm (BSA) is applied to in this paper to reduce the computational complexity. Numerical studies are conducted on a modified IEEE 30-bus system that includes 3 wind farms and 2 solar farms. Comprehensive comparisons are carried out on the results achieved by the proposed method, other Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) and the deterministic dispatch, which verifies the superiority of CI-BSA. Besides, a trade-off relationship between the fuel cost and pollution emission is analyzed based on the Pareto front in the experimental studies.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 570
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Optimal power flow with emission and non-smooth cost functions using backtracking search optimization algorithm
    Chaib, A. E.
    Bouchekara, H. R. E. H.
    Mehasni, R.
    Abido, M. A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL POWER & ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2016, 81 : 64 - 77
  • [2] Confidence interval for the mean of the exponential distribution, based on grouped data
    Chen, ZM
    Mi, J
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1996, 45 (04) : 671 - 677
  • [3] Robust Standard Errors in Small Samples: Some Practical Advice
    Imbens, Guido W.
    Kolesar, Michal
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 98 (04) : 701 - 712
  • [4] Probabilistic performance assessment of autonomous solar-wind energy conversion systems
    Karaki, SH
    Chedid, RB
    Ramadan, R
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 1999, 14 (03) : 766 - 772
  • [5] Multi-objective optimization for integrated hydro-photovoltaic power system
    Li, Fang-Fang
    Qiu, Jun
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 167 : 377 - 384
  • [6] Security-constrained bi-level economic dispatch model for integrated natural gas and electricity systems considering wind power and power-to-gas process
    Li, Guoqing
    Zhang, Rufeng
    Jiang, Tao
    Chen, Houhe
    Bai, Linquan
    Li, Xiaojing
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 194 : 696 - 704
  • [7] Stochastic multi-objective optimization for economic-emission dispatch with uncertain wind power and distributed loads
    Li, M. S.
    Wu, Q. H.
    Ji, T. Y.
    Rao, H.
    [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2014, 116 : 367 - 373
  • [8] Risk constrained economic dispatch with integration of wind power by multi-objective optimization approach
    Li, Y. Z.
    Li, K. C.
    Wang, P.
    Liu, Y.
    Lin, X. N.
    Gooi, H. B.
    Li, G. F.
    Cai, D. L.
    Luo, Y.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 126 : 810 - 820
  • [9] Liu Q., IEEE T CYBERNETICS
  • [10] Probability distributions for offshore wind speeds
    Morgan, Eugene C.
    Lackner, Matthew
    Vogel, Richard M.
    Baise, Laurie G.
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2011, 52 (01) : 15 - 26