Statistical Inference for Covariate-Adaptive Randomization Procedures

被引:41
作者
Ma, Wei [1 ]
Qin, Yichen [2 ]
Li, Yang [1 ]
Hu, Feifang [3 ]
机构
[1] Renmin Univ China, Inst Stat & Big Data, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Dept Operat Business Analyt & Informat Syst, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] George Washington Univ, Dept Stat, 801 22nd St NW, Washington, DC 20052 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Asymptotic normality; Balancing covariates; Conservative tests; Power; Sequential analysis; SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIALS; BIASED COIN RANDOMIZATION; ALLOCATION; VALIDITY; DESIGNS; TESTS; POWER;
D O I
10.1080/01621459.2019.1635483
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
Covariate-adaptive randomization (CAR) procedures are frequently used in comparative studies to increase the covariate balance across treatment groups. However, because randomization inevitably uses the covariate information when forming balanced treatment groups, the validity of classical statistical methods after such randomization is often unclear. In this article, we derive the theoretical properties of statistical methods based on general CAR under the linear model framework. More importantly, we explicitly unveil the relationship between covariate-adaptive and inference properties by deriving the asymptotic representations of the corresponding estimators. We apply the proposed general theory to various randomization procedures such as complete randomization, rerandomization, pairwise sequential randomization, and Atkinson's D-A-biased coin design and compare their performance analytically. Based on the theoretical results, we then propose a new approach to obtain valid and more powerful tests. These results open a door to understand and analyze experiments based on CAR. Simulation studies provide further evidence of the advantages of the proposed framework and the theoretical results. for this article are available online.
引用
收藏
页码:1488 / 1497
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   The covariate-adaptive biased coin design for balancing clinical trials in the presence of prognostic factors [J].
Antognini, A. Baldi ;
Zagoraiou, M. .
BIOMETRIKA, 2011, 98 (03) :519-535
[2]   OPTIMUM BIASED COIN DESIGNS FOR SEQUENTIAL CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
ATKINSON, AC .
BIOMETRIKA, 1982, 69 (01) :61-67
[3]   ADAPTIVE ALLOCATION IN RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS [J].
BIRKETT, NJ .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1985, 6 (02) :146-155
[4]   Inference Under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization [J].
Bugni, Federico A. ;
Canay, Ivan A. ;
Shaikh, Azeem M. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 113 (524) :1784-1796
[5]   Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets [J].
Chandler, Dana ;
Kapelner, Adam .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2013, 90 :123-133
[6]   A long-term comparison of pioglitazone and gliclazide in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison trial [J].
Charbonnel, BH ;
Matthews, DR ;
Schernthaner, G ;
Hanefeld, M ;
Brunetti, P .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2005, 22 (04) :399-405
[7]   FORCING A SEQUENTIAL EXPERIMENT TO BE BALANCED [J].
EFRON, B .
BIOMETRIKA, 1971, 58 (03) :403-&
[8]  
EMA, 2015, GUID ADJ BAS COV CLI
[9]   VALIDITY AND POWER OF TESTS WHEN GROUPS HAVE BEEN BALANCED FOR PROGNOSTIC FACTORS [J].
FORSYTHE, AB .
COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 1987, 5 (03) :193-200
[10]  
Frane JW, 1998, DRUG INF J, V32, P423, DOI 10.1177/009286159803200213