Categorising the broad impacts of continuing professional development: a scoping review

被引:75
作者
Allen, Louise M. [1 ]
Palermo, Claire [2 ]
Armstrong, Elizabeth [3 ]
Hay, Margaret [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Monash Inst Hlth & Clin Educ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Monash Ctr Scholarship Hlth Educ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Harvard Macy Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
MEDICAL-EDUCATION; HEALTH-CARE; PHYSICIAN PERFORMANCE; FACULTY-DEVELOPMENT; PATIENT HEALTH;
D O I
10.1111/medu.13922
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Context A number of systematic reviews have evaluated the impacts of continuing professional development (CPD). These reviews, due to their focused nature, may fail to capture the full range of impacts of CPD. This scoping review aims to explore the broader impacts of CPD with the intention of developing a categorisation of the types of impact of CPD. Methods The authors searched MEDLINE, CINAHL and ERIC databases for studies published between 2007 and 2017 that looked at the impacts of formal CPD programmes for all health professionals. Studies were independently screened for eligibility; one reviewer charted data for all included studies, a sample of 10% was reviewed by a second reviewer. The charted data were analysed using both qualitative and quantitative content analysis. Results The search returned 2750 manuscripts; 192 manuscripts describing 191 studies were included in this review. Most articles were from the USA (78 studies, 41%) and included medical doctors in the population (105 studies, 55%). Twelve categories of impact were generated through conventional content analysis: knowledge, practice change, skill, confidence, attitudes, career development, networking, user outcomes, intention to change, organisational change, personal change and scholarly accomplishments. Knowledge was most commonly measured (103 studies, 54%), whereas measurement of scholarly accomplishments was the least common (10 studies, 5%). Conclusions Existing evidence takes a narrow view when assessing the impacts of CPD. Emphasis on measuring impacts as knowledge, behaviour, confidence, skills and attitudes may be due to the widely accepted four levels of evaluation from the Kirkpatrick Model or because the majority of studies used quantitative methods. The categories proposed in this review may be used to capture a broader view of the impacts of CPD programmes, contributing to the evidence base for their value and translating into CPD programmes that truly transform health professionals, their careers and their practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1087 / 1099
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education , 2017, ACCME DAT REP GROWTH
[2]  
American Medical Association, CONTINUING MED ED
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003030
[4]  
Arksey H., 2005, INT J SOC RES METHOD, V8, P19, DOI [10.1080/1364557032000119616, DOI 10.1080/1364557032000119616]
[5]  
Armstrong EG, 2013, ED STORIES CREATING, P23
[6]  
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, AUSTR HLTH PRACT REG
[7]   Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes: a systematic review [J].
Barbour, Liza ;
Armstrong, Rebecca ;
Condron, Patrick ;
Palermo, Claire .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 22 (02) :326-343
[8]  
Bellolio MF, 2009, ANN EMERG MED, V53, P685, DOI [10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.05.034, 10.1002/14651858.CD003030.pub2]
[9]   Effects of continuing medical education on improving physician clinical care and patient health: A review of systematic reviews [J].
Bloom, BS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2005, 21 (03) :380-385
[10]   Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development health care: a critical review of the evidence [J].
Brown, CA ;
Belfield, CR ;
Field, SJ .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7338) :652-655