Assessing clinical quality performance and staffing capacity differences between urban and rural Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers in the United States: A cross sectional study

被引:8
作者
Pourat, Nadereh [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Xiao [1 ]
Lu, Connie [1 ]
Zhou, Weihao [1 ]
Hoang, Hank [3 ]
Sripipatana, Alek [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Hlth Policy Res, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Fielding Sch Publ Hlth, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] US Dept HHS, Bur Primary Hlth Care Hlth Resources & Serv Adm, Rockville, MD USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 12期
关键词
CARE; ACCESS; HIV; HIV/AIDS; BARRIERS; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0242844
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background In the United States, there are nearly 1,400 Health Resources and Services Administration-funded health centers (HCs) serving low-income and underserved populations and more than 600 of these HCs are located in rural areas. Disparities in quality of medical care in urban vs. rural areas exist but data on such differences between urban and rural HCs is limited in the literature. We examined whether urban and rural HCs differed in their performance on clinical quality measures before and after controlling for patient, organizational, and contextual characteristics. Methods and findings We used the 2017 Uniform Data System to examine performance on clinical quality measures between urban and rural HCs (n = 1,373). We used generalized linear regression models with the logit link function and binomial distribution, controlling for confounding factors. After adjusting for potential confounders, we found on par performance between urban and rural HCs in all but one clinical quality measure. Rural HCs had lower rates of linking patients newly diagnosed with HIV to care (74% [95% CI: 69%, 80%] vs. 83% [95% CI: 80%, 86%]). We identified control variables that systematically accounted for eliminating urban vs. rural differences in performance on clinical quality measures. We also found that both urban and rural HCs had some clinical quality performance measures that were lower than available national benchmarks. Main limitations included potential discrepancy of urban or rural designation across all HC sites within a HC organization. Conclusions Findings highlight HCs' contributions in addressing rural disparities in quality of care and identify opportunities for improvement. Performance in both rural and urban HCs may be improved by supporting programs that increase the availability of providers, training, and provision of technical resources.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] School-based health centers: Improving access and quality of care for low-income adolescents
    Allison, Mandy A.
    Crane, Lori A.
    Beaty, Brenda L.
    Davidson, Arthur J.
    Melinkovich, Paul
    Kempe, Allison
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2007, 120 (04) : e887 - E894
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, END HIV EP PLAN AM
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, NAT HEALTHC QUAL DIS
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2014, PREV CHRONIC DIS, V11, pE62
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2003, AM J KIDNEY DIS S, V41, pI
  • [6] Associated Press, 2014, BLOOMINGTON HER 0602, V6, pB5
  • [7] Community Health Center Access to Resources for their Patients with Diabetes
    Baig, Arshiya A.
    Locklin, Cara A.
    Campbell, Amanda
    Schaefer, Cynthia T.
    Heuer, Loretta J.
    Lee, Sang Mee
    Solomon, Marla C.
    Quinn, Michael T.
    Vargas, J. Martin
    Burnet, Deborah L.
    Chin, Marshall H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2014, 16 (03) : 553 - 558
  • [8] Stata tip 63: Modeling proportions
    Baum, Christopher F.
    [J]. STATA JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (02) : 299 - 303
  • [9] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2018, Diabetes Mental Health
  • [10] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2019, QUAL PAYM PROGR OV